gravityowl

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

No, you most definitely did not get it

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Advocates are urging the Biden administration to act quickly

Why? The Liberals and Democrats as a whole acted as if everything was fine for the past 4 years. They only appointed Jack Smith 2 years after Jan 6.

They don't need to act quickly because they are not the ones facing the bulk of consequences. Biden did not and could not care less because his party doesn't see fascism as the existential threat that it is

Edit: if you think I'm exaggerating, remember when a few weeks before dropping out, Biden explicitily said that if he lost against Trump, he would've been happy with himself because at least he gave it all? Yeah. That's not the reaction of someone who truly sees fascism as a cancer to society and democracy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Your take is only disagreeable because of how unrealistic it is. Do you honestly think everyone else, or even better, society as a whole can implement such time-consuming and long-term methods?

I'm not arguing against the worth or effectiveness of the method. It's actually extremely impressive as a story, but is it feasible as your average way to deal with racists?

Spoiler, no it's not feasible

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well, not everyone is going to be openly vocal about a shitty take. That's a personal choice anyone can make. Just like I chose to express my disagreement about that original pointless comment, about my disappointment at anyone who upvoted it...and now at you too for, I'm guessing, being one of those who also upvoted that.

Am I supposed to feel bad about someone who's playing the devil's advocate for racist people? Lmao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think what's more depressing about all of this is how many people agreed with you...yuck

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

if there are peaceful solutions to redistributing the wealth

But that's the whole point, there aren't any.

The whole idea of being able to tax them fairly and properly is merely a pacifier so the people think they have a chance. And while they hope something might change, the rich actually use their power, money and influence to rig the system in a way that ensure they'll never have to pay their fair share.

There's no peaceful solution to the unethical and violent accumulation of wealth

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

But its statistically significant that most abortions happen as a result of the potential babydaddy doing a blow-n-go and leaving the female with a hard decision

Source: this information came to you in a dream you had once

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

No, you're not "maybe wrong". You're absolutely and completely wrong seen as abstinence only programs have been shown over and over again to be ineffective. It's a sad attempt at policing people's desire for sex

view more: ‹ prev next ›