gatohaus

Huh, well never thought I’d agree with this nutcase but that would be a good move.

What’s the catch?

Mastodon but not nearly as much as Lemmy.

Bookwyrm but not nearly as much as Mastodon.

I really wanted Bookwyrm to be more useful for me. But it’s really not geared towards what I want in keeping track of books. ymmv

Few people can focus enough to read.

I work in a technical field. In the past few years I’ve learned that interacting by email usually requires one-line sentences or bullet points, with any questions being numbered. No fluff, no secondary thoughts or possibilities. Keep it as minimal as possible.

It still fails to elicit a coherent response about half the time, but it’s the best I’ve found so far.

It didn’t use to be like this. But what’s to blame; screen addiction, microplastics, covid, increased stress, … ?

I’d be glad to:

Pack his bags tonight preflight..

Really? Only 13%?

Maybe it’s a lagging indicator? Maybe sales in China picked up? Maybe the numbers have been finessed?

Obligatory, #NotTheOnion

And the Dems are, mostly, still too safe. They need to start fighting while they still have a chance of stopping the insanity.

Step 1: Schumer needs to step down.

Reconsidering 4 (second nose).. Maybe you could cause a second nose to grow on others..? And if a few of us choose this, then we could form an unstoppable team, horribly disfiguring war criminals, oligarchs, and mimes everywhere!

But.. no container is truly empty.
Usually they contain air, but even in space there'd be one or two molecules banging around inside.
You'd never see anything.

This.
Free gravel for life is OP! (probly gets nerfed in the next update)

I too assume it's 7" from center of mass. So not even beyond the boundary of my body.

Wow, it’s been a while since I’ve heard someone spout this much hopium and half-truths.

2.1C by 2100?? That’s just delusional. We’ll hit that by 2035 at the latest.

Please find a better source for global warming information. Perhaps start with Hansen.