galloog1

If you use violence to bring about your preferred society, you enable violence as a tool of oppression by that society.

If you actively seek to murder people, I will actively ensure you are put in jail. I apply the same logic to fascists. Fascists only gain power throughout history when the left starts to actively degrade people's lives. This is why the left historically has shifted to reform as the ethical approach and have gradually shifted more liberal.

If you cannot convince anyone with your words, you certainly won't with your violence.

I agree which is why I consider myself a liberal.

So, you want to kill specific people because there is not a law against what they do?

I'm trying to get you to understand how extreme and also illogical this is. I know a lot of ethical left leaning people. You are not one of them.

Is a specific billionaire actively threatening your life with physical violence? I don't think you understand how self defense works.

If murder is the only thing that works for people like you, don't be surprised when it's what you receive in return with the backing of the state.

Well, everyone is entitled to a fair trial. They are not guilty or eligible for capital punishment until that's completed and found guilty by a jury of their peers. Try again, extremist.

I propose calling it a Lemmy Leap.

So maybe don't advocate for murder. Additionally, don't suggest it as a solution if your views do not represent the majority opinion. That's literally called radical extremism.

That's literally the definition of economic fascism. Private corporations that are subservient to a one party state. The efficiencies of capitalism directed towards the will of the people.

I think it's important that people understand the core argument behind fascism because if you do not counter it, you allow it to spread. Sometimes not by name but in form.

It's also my core argument against any non liberal radicalism but that's not a popular view on this platform for some reason.