folkrav

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

Yes, but it's IMHO not as clear cut. Some of the things we do because of our executive function disorder can be interpreted as us being assholes by those we interact with. One can act like an asshole at times and not intrinsically be one. Some things are perceived as assholeish by some people but not others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Really bigger updates obviously require a major version bump to signify to users that there is potential stability or breakage issues expected.

If your software is following semver, not necessarily. It only requires a major version bump if a change is breaking backwards compatibility. You can have very big minor releases and tiny major releases.

there was more time for people to run pre-release versions if they are adventurous and thus there is better testing

Again, by experience, this is assuming a lot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

From experience shipping releases, "bigger updates" and "more tested" are more or less antithetical. The testing surface area tends to grow exponentially with the amount of features you ship with a given release, to the point I tend to see small, regular releases, as a better sign of stability.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Agreed. They're a solid power metal pick regardless as well

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Sleep I get, but you'd be surprised at what constitutes "work music" for me then hehe

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

I'd love to share your optimism, especially regarding that last sentence. As long as Google controls the most popular web browser out there, I don't see the arms race ever stopping, they'll just come up with something else. It wouldn't be the first time they push towards something nobody asked for that only benefits themselves.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Your first hint that this is a naive take is that you're brushing off a societal issue to a single, external factor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I do connect to VMs and containers all the time, I just don't see a reason not to speed myself up on my own machines because of it. To me, the downside of typing an alias on a machine that doesn't have it once in a while, is much less than having to type everything out or searching my shell history for longer commands every single time. My shell configs are in a dotfiles repo I can clone to new personal/work machines easily, and I have an alias to rsync some key parts to VMs if needed. Containers, I just always assume I don't have access to anything but builtins. I guess if you don't do the majority of your work on a local shell, it may indeed not be worth it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I'd rather optimize for the 99% case, which is me getting shit done on my machine, than refuse to use convenient stuff for the sake of maybe not forgetting a command I can perfectly just look up if I do legitimately happen to forget about it. If I'm on a remote, I already don't have access to all my usual software anyway, what's a couple more aliases? To me this sounds like purposefully deciding to slow yourself down cutting paper with a knife all the time cause you may not have access to scissors when you happen to sit at someone else's desk.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Once the monopoly is in place, what's protecting said "reasonable cost for the consumer", exactly?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah, you too! Furthest I got in BG3 is the goblin camp lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Funny, I just started it again a week ago. For the third time. I'm enjoying it a lot, like the last two times, but I have a lingering feeling this won't last lol

view more: ‹ prev next ›