folkrav

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even for a billion it’s such a shit deal. Billions of years of doing nothing experiencing the Big Bang and burning alive for centuries on end, to get pennies a year you ultimately will get to spend in the very last fractions of a percent of it all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

I don’t see a point to me doing it yet again, when it has already been many times over, in better words than I could, in this one thread and beyond. The men’s lib movement this community is about is by definition, if not outright feminist, very feminist adjacent and aligns on many views. This is not the “men’s rights” movement.

For what it’s worth, if you are actually asking for my take and not an info dump, IMHO, the semantic argument is rarely very strong. In practice, tons of the societal issues women face align with men’s, for example on their very opposition on traditional roles.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

The “the word implies women superiority” argument has to be the proverbial dead horse that gets beaten with a stick, when it comes to feminism, at this point…

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We can also change your thought experiment to help people conceptualise the “billion” part. Instead of a lump sum after a billion years, let’s just take the original million and divide it so you receive the same amount for every year you complete. Does receiving a hundredth of a cent ($0.001) for every year you sit in said room sound like a very good deal?

Even with hundreds of billions of dollars, it sounds like an insanely bad deal. It doesn’t even cover a yearly salary, and money would be completely unusable for 99.99% of that time lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Funny, my father was born to what was considered pretty old parents, for the time. But grandma in particular really wasn’t very representative of the Silent Generation lol

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

IMHO, when taken simply as a group of people who have experienced a common set of cultural/societal defining events in their formative years, it’s a pretty useful generalization. For example I have no trouble believing literally born with the internet has had a significantly different effect on Zoomers than it had on us Millenials who learned to use it at the same time as our parents.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I honestly don’t think that’s the case. Generational divides aren’t that strongly defined that they have a specific cutoff date and time, people don’t really agree on exact moments. Some people who were born after said cutoff are better described by the previous generation, and vice-versa. For example, if you go strictly by date of birth, by most definitions of the term, my father is a (very late) boomer, but his life experience is much more similar to what defined Gen X’ers.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a convoluted way they chose to say “we didn’t use a prepared statement” lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, from what I could gather from both specs ATProto does address some shortcomings of ActivityPub, so the idea has some technical merit. While a lot of the current Fediverse seems to have settled on AP, it’s not like it’s the be-all and end-all of federated protocols either.

Maybe you’re just talking about the company behind it?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’d rather have them on Bluesky/AT than Threads, to be perfectly honest…

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

My vote goes to Kpectacle

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I’d say it’s just a specific case of a strawman argument, but maybe I’m misunderstanding.

view more: ‹ prev next ›