fl42v

Smth like GNU's development server. More like development potato, tho

It's basically a glorified luks/zfs password prompt.

So, basically, you make software that doesn't work outside flatpak without patches, then start removed about how much those patches suck, then, instead of pretty much saying "we only support flapaks, stop bothering us with distro-related issues" on the issue page, you add even more stuff that needs to be patched out because "sesurity"? Makes perfect sense, ngl.

Actively resisting packaging is not the way, tho. You can just require an issue to be reproducible with flatpak, and otherwise tell ppl to bother the maintainer.

It's the last move you see before a glass cannon oneshots you

Plot twist: it's NPD

I suppose Microsoft doesn't really care what ppl think or are comfortable with: it's mostly OEMs that buy windows keys anyways, and they'll continue doing so in the foreseeable future no matter how much windows sucks 🤷

Why?

As for w11 requirements, you also need a uefi, iirc. Here's a random article on doing that: https://www.ctrl.blog/entry/how-to-win11-in-gnome-boxes.html

Likely a great way to overcompensate or something.

Not when you're "stuck", tho. You understand the problem, boot live system, fix it and learn from your mistakes. Like, my first reinstalls of arch were due to not understanding I can just chroot or pacstrap some packages I forgot, for example.

Again, how's that thing better than some Chinese h96 you can get for like $30 and flash armbian on?