Moving from Porlex II to Kingrinder K6
So, I was perfectly happy with my Porlex mini II, as a I love specialty coffee but I definitely don’t understand yet the small nuances in coffee brewing.
But a couple of days ago my sister accidentally broke the ceramic burr. I was going to just buy the burr but I instead made a little research, suspecting I could get a better grinder. Eventually I landed on the Kingrinder K6 and I was able to receive it the very following day.
So, I’m using for just a couple of days, but the difference is immense.
The object itself is much bigger and HEAVIER, I couldn’t believe how much more robust it felt. Also is far more complex and sophisticated in its assembly, and the structure is more stable.
It’s very handy, firstly because it can easily grind much more coffee, much more quickly and easily. It also features the external grinding size adjustment with precise clicks easy to check thanks to the marks on the outside.
But the main difference is the resulting ground. At a first look it does look more evenly sized but you can’t really be sure. By just brewing it with a V60 the difference couldn’t be clearer.
With the Porlex, the coffee ground after brewing featured a mud-like smooth layer covering both the paper and the coarser particles. It almost disappeared with the K6, only the coarser ground is visible now. Also the brewing time got shorter, especially when brewing two cups of coffee at a time (500ml of water for 30g of coffee).
The only downside is the maintenance. The Porlex burr is made of ceramics, you can easily wash them with a toothbrush and water and make it completely white and clean again.
The K6 burr is made of metal, the manual strongly recommends to avoid water and just brush it, however due to the complexity of the mechanisms it takes a bit longer to disassemble it and definitely more hustle to reassemble it. In particular it requires a very tiny piece to be put back in place in the end which is particularly annoying. I think it may be a huge problem for people with lower hand mobility and strength, so I would appreciate if this process were a bit more accessible.
In a nutshell, it costs like 20€ more than Porlex but looks like a completely different category. I couldn’t recommend it more
#coffee
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
Come detto apprezzo l’attenzione nello scegliere questa soluzione specifica.
Poi, di nuovo, fosse stato fatto in sordina nessuno se ne sarebbe lamentato immagino, ma ne è stato fatto un post, allora sottolineo ancora la criticità della cosa dal punto di vista di chi lavora o comunque si applica in ambito visuale e artistico, come me, e cioè che quando ci accorgiamo di star guardando un’immagine generata l’amarezza che sentiamo è tanta, soprattutto in un ambito libero come questo dove non ci aspettiamo che succeda
A costo di essere noioso, specifico che non è mia intenzione montare un caso su una questione banale come questa, ho solo risposto al post, seppur lamentandomi. L’unico invito che posso fare è di fare certe precisazioni in anticipo, perché il momento è critico e se i LLM vengono utilizzati è bene precisarlo, e se questo LLM è oltretutto open source e usato in locale ancora meglio, se non altro si aiuta a divulgare un uso più consapevole di questi strumenti