exasperation

Is it like the Italian American "shrimp scampi" where it's just the words for shrimp in two different languages? My understanding is that "salami" is just the Italian word for cured sausage.

Also, "pepperoni" is an Italian American word for a spicy salami that contains peppers, so it's just a type.

Sounds like an authentic experience of using one of those old landlines.

Well it's not like Japanese or Chinese (or Italian or British or French or Danish or Mexican) chefs stopped inventing new dishes. Tonkotsu ramen was invented in the 1930's. The original Kung Pao Chicken was invented sometime in the mid 19th century, in China. And General Tso's was probably invented in Taiwan and brought to the United States shortly afterward.

Whether a dish is invented in its ostensibly "home" country or by emigrants from that country doesn't actually change the legitimacy of the dish. There's no rule against chefs inventing new dishes, whether they are immigrants or not.

Cookie is already a slang term for pussy, you can skip that step.

Industrious eye

What sense does it make if you raise your population and everyone is miserably poor or on the edge of becoming poor?

There's an overall negative correlation between wealth and fertility, so it's not like the rich are having a ton of kids, either. Or even the societies with decent metrics on wealth or income equality, still tend to be low birth rate countries.

It's a difficult problem, with no one solution (because it's not one cause). Some of it is cultural. Some of it is economic. There are a lot of feedback effects and peer effects, too. And each society has its own mix of cultural and economic issues.

And I'm not actually disagreeing with you. I think there's probably something to be said for cheap cost of living allowing for people to be more comfortable having more children (or at a younger age, which also mathematically grows populations faster than having the same number of children at an older age).

Nothing's been done about it since then.

Research has gone into safer replacements. Many companies have been switching to BPA-free formulas, most notably CVS (notorious for sheer area of thermal paper receipts) that went BPA/BPS free in 2019. Some governments have banned BPA thermal paper, and others, including the EU, have set limits. BPA has been getting phased out because of these studies.

Nothing will be done about it now.

Well no, this organization is lining up to try to replicate the success with getting BPA out of thermal paper by trying to get BPS replaced, too.

Here's a study of Switzerland. Between 2014 and 2019, the incidence of BPA thermal paper went from 81% down to around 50%, and then after the ban it went to around 10%. BPS has seen some backsliding, and has increased from 3.1% to 19.1%. Still, that's a significant reduction in the past decade of papers that use either BPA or BPS.

People are doing the work. There's no reason to sit around and do nothing and complain that others are doing nothing, too.

You don't need a normal distribution or statistical independence. It just requires that any given key combination remain possible.

No matter how unlikely, anything that is possible will eventually happen in an infinite time.

Some infinities are bigger than others, though.

Even if you have countably infinite monkeys typing countably infinite strings for an infinite period of time, there will be an infinite number of strings that the monkeys haven't typed, that will never be in the set of completed typed strings.

Cantor's diagonalization proves it.

Two new monkeys show up, and even though the infinite rooms and infinite typewriters are already occupied, you can make room for them by making all of the monkeys move over one room, and putting the new monkeys in that newly vacant room with the newly available typewriters.

Ok there Ongo Baglogian

Have you ever had to clean public restrooms? Nothing microscopic about the drops of splashback.