Exactly that. Router A
ip address add 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth1
ip address add 10.0.0.1/30 dev eth2
ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 10.0.0.2
Router B
ip address add 192.168.2.1/24 dev eth1
ip address add 10.0.0.2/30 dev eth2
ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 10.0.0.1
Does this make it more clear?
I use the IPP integration for that
Have we got AskEurope too?
Hmmm it seems that router B there should be a bridge. However, how comfortable are you with routing in general?
Traceroute from device in subnet A to device in subnet B
Note that the only way to do that in only two hops is to have the same router handle both subnets, contrary to what I said earlier.
No, not at all 🙂. I'm referring to a configuration in which the two routers are linked through another subnet (using a separate link between the two) and this link is the point to point link. You usually assign a /30 so you can have an address for each router. ~This way the traceroute shows three hops instead of just two.~ However, since you’ve already told us that this is not your setup, what I’m saying shouldn’t matter to you. If you’re curious though, let’s keep talking :)
Edit: striked mistake
No, with PtP I meant a point to point link on a dedicated interface just for the two routers. https://image2.slideserve.com/5192070/point-to-point-sub-interfaces-l.jpg
This works if B has an interface that is connected to the A subnet, but not if you have a PtP between the two routers
Then I don’t understand your topology. However, I still think you need the reflector on both routers
Thanks, I was out of the loop
I definitely agree!