eru

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

sounds about right

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

female repellent hoodie

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

yes, just not commonplace

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

your own self hosted one

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

>really needs to catch up with Japan in bathroom tech in general

yes gimme those bidets

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

if your domain is like cock.li or smth then maybe, but protonmail.com sounds pretty professional

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

'fuckoff big microwave transmitter'

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

~~sugar~~ sucrose

sugar is a generic term

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

sure that is how pop3 does it

but metadata is still replicated to the server, so this does not solve the metadata replication issue

even if you dont explicitly store metadata or encrypt it in some way, the server still necessarily knows stuff like timestamps of when the messages are sent for example.

sure, you can delete it later, but you also have to trust the server to actually do that, and there is no way to guarantee this in any protocol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

what alternative do you propose for saving messages when the recipient is offline?

view more: ‹ prev next ›