your hardware ain't shit until it's a first gen core2duo in a random Dell office PC and 2gb of memory that you specifically only use just because it's a cheaper way to get x86 when you can't use your raspberry pi.
Also they lie most of the time and it may technically run fine on more memory, especially if it's older when dimm capacities were a lot lower than they can be now. It just won't be "supported".
Where is their thin colored line?
It's a thin yellow line exiting directly out of Louis DeJoy's dick hole
How is it better if someone just goes and circles a random name on the list because its mandatory?
Statistically, if a large population being "forced" to vote were voting names randomly on ballots that had their own order randomly assigned, then their votes would be evenly distributed and not end up affecting the results.
"Peak alpha male"
As long as the address is specific enough to get through the right distribution center and to the right ending post office... chances are the carriers it ends up with will absolutely figure out where it needs to go.
use it against themselves. communicate the truth about the real issues solely through minion memes.
And very few carry HDMI, because for some strange odd reason hdmi alt-mode is weirdly rare still....
You mean to tell me when two egomaniacs enter the same room, they have a problem with one another?????????
The single CCD cache stack was a huge problem with the original x3d dual ccd chips (7900/12coreand 7950/16core) as OS'es were not "ccd aware" about which chiplet has the cache. There is a huge access penalty for cache traversal between chiplets as the data has to travel across the infinity fabric rather than inside the CCD only. When the OS would distribute threads across both ccd's because it only saw threads, you would never get the full benefit of x3d due to loads being placed on cores without x3d and incurring the traversal penalty. This has largely been fixed in Windows and Linux by now, but it still limits the true potential of the non-x3d ccd.
Dual cache stacks would allow both CCD's to utilize the full benefits of a massive cache rather than just one.
This applies to human behavior on this medium, not the machines and services themselves.
I'd argue thr machines behave this way somewhat similarly too. The Internet's services are designed around resiliency first and foremost, what with how IP packet routing is designed for "Any Possible Path" between end points. Any path that becomes "damaged" or otherwise closed is often circumvented if another link exists in the network.
The only way to truely restrict and censor internet data is to control 100% of the data paths into a certain geographical area and inspect every single bit passing through them, which is a monumental task.
But will still vote to confirm of course.
"reee i won't vote for harris because gaza genocide!!1!1" users on lemmy suspiciously silent now