emizeko

joined 5 years ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yeah after more reflection that drone made a big boom and is small enough that how much fuel or battery could it really carry? maybe it was launched from a speedboat in the med

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

speculative from an IbnRiad retweet, but makes ~~the most~~ some sense

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (8 children)

it probably helped a lot that it was flying at an altitude of like... 5 to 10 meters

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

here's the video. (NYPost) he's trying to take credit for appointing a black defense secretary, but he can't remember Lloyd Austin's name so it comes out as a slurry that appears to refer to him as "Black man". don't worry though, just a stutter.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you're going to hear the term "critical support" in the responses, here's a good background on it

A Marxist understanding of capitalism leads to anti-imperialism. Anti-imperialism is understood by detractors as a simple rhetorical dressing over simplistic heuristics like “reflexive anti-americanism,” “history repeats itself,” and “the military-industrial complex needs contracts,” but all of these are reductive. Marxists understand that human political leadership in the imperial periphery, whether enlightened or tyrannical, will only be antagonized by empire for one single possible reason: it is getting in the way of market penetration. This is phrased succinctly by Kevin Dooley when criticizing Noam Chomsky’s support for a military alliance between the Kurds and the USA in Syria: “The difference between [Chomsky’s] position and a hard-line anti-imperialist position isn’t tactical. What he’s arguing is simply a violation of anti-imperialist principles based on a fundamentally different understanding of what can drive the empire to act in the world.” [16]

The accusation that anti-imperialists are unconcerned with human rights deserves a sharp rebuke. The USA was born of slavery and genocide, dropped atomic bombs as a matter of political brinkmanship, imported Nazi scientists and installed war criminals like Klaus Barbie and Nobusuke Kishi around the world to defend and advance anti-communist positions [17], and enthusiastically supports gruesome butcherers today. Simply put, Capital has destroyed innumerable countries and murdered hundreds of millions directly and indirectly. It is precisely a concern for the rights of humans that should make one immediately skeptical of any humanitarian posturing by Capital. Anti-imperialism not only means support for the important pro-social projects of states like Cuba, Vietnam, and China; it also means critical support for non-socialist states such as Iran and Russia. Critical support acknowledges that, though instituting various indefensible policies, enemies of empire are not being antagonized because of said policies. The only thing that can drive empire to act in the world is capital accumulation.

from https://redsails.org/why-marxism/

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's like the USA jammed a piece of Pine up Australia's Gap

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Tyler Durden with a spherical beer belly

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

If he falls low in this next debate, I’ll consider changing my outlook.

"I'll wait half of the crucial remaining time before the election to decide, making that choice significantly less effective"

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

imo summer of 2020 was bigger than trump's near miss

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

brilliant, that's the side they least expect threats from

view more: ‹ prev next ›