emizeko

joined 5 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Weapons are an important factor in war, but not the decisive factor; it is people, not things that are decisive. The contest of strength is not only a contest of military and economic power, but also a contest of human power and morale. People necessarily wield military and economic power.

—Mao Zedong, On Protracted War (May 1958), Selected Works, Vol. II, pp. 143-44.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

It's content for poor people to tell poor people they are responsible for their own circumstances.

If communists are trying to tell the poor that the wealthy are responsible for their circumstances that can not go unopposed, they create propaganda sources that exist solely to provide the opposite narrative.

Like a true abuser, the capitalist makes the victim blame themselves in order to get them to reject help from those around them that want to help the abused.

@[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

According to the cybernetician, the purpose of a system is what it does. This is a basic dictum. It stands for bald fact, which makes a better starting point in seeking understanding than the familiar attributions of good intention, prejudices about expectations, moral judgment, or sheer ignorance of circumstances.

—Stafford Beer

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

Anyone who loves freedom owes such a debt to the Red Army that it can never be repaid.

—Ernest Hemingway

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

itll be interesting to see who "hates the cops" when they get robbed and need someone to show up 7 hours later and shrug their shoulders

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Whiteness is also an imaginary concept and a figment of the racist imagination, of course, but that doesn’t make it any less real, or deadly; whiteness is a thing because people insist that it is, and use force and violence to make it so. Whiteness is a thing because white supremacists needed a name for their violent subjugation of others, and so they gave it one. In this way, whiteness is a uniquely virulent and pathological form of social identity. It cannot survive its loss of supremacy; it cannot abide competition or mixture or “impurity.” Created by racial slavery and given a second wind by European imperialism, whiteness depends on the violent subordination of all others. Celebrate your Irish heritage if you must, or your Pennsylvania Dutch grandparents; that has nothing to do with the whiteness that names me, now, but which (partially) excluded my Irish and German ancestors when they came to this nation. Irish and Pennsylvania Dutch can and will survive incorporation into a multi-ethnic nation, but it is the sine qua non of whiteness that it cannot and will not. Inextricable from racial subordination, whiteness has no other content at all: whiteness is what’s left in the melting pot after everything else has been burned away. Without that xenophobic fire, it has no meaning, no substance, no fundamental.

This is why “white genocide” actually does have a meaning beyond “racial integration.” If you take away a white person’s ability to live as the undisputed master of the universe—to take his own experience as normal and privileged, and to presume all others to be debased copies of his own primary existence—then you take away his whiteness.

from Buffalo Skulls

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

The strength of Marx’s critique is that in its breadth of disciplinary and historical scope, it managed to identify how the hydra of market economy comes to dominate its operators, how Capital rules in the domains of both production and ideology, and how via the notion of “self-interest” it diffuses responsibility for its crimes in an incredibly elegant way. The social planning and hierarchical organizational structures humans have built to fight Capital stand out as alien when contrasted with the naturalized discipline imposed by the market in the “free world,” however ruthless. Getting over the misconception that these structures are unnecessary allows us to begin learning from the experience of comrades around the world, both in and out of power.

To defeat Capital, we must understand how it works, so we can exploit its weaknesses. As Huey Newton put it: “You cannot oppose a system such as this without opposing it with organization that’s even more extremely disciplined and dedicated than the structure you’re opposing.” An understanding of capitalism’s inner dynamics, coupled with careful and broad study of the real history of class struggle, will enable us to fight to free humanity from domination by Capital from within the imperial core. Nothing less than this will do.

from https://redsails.org/why-marxism/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

They plunder, they slaughter, and they steal: this they call empire, and where they make a wasteland, they call it peace.

—Tacitus

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“whataboutism” means “you’re absolutely fucking 100% right and I am a big liberal baby who shidded his doodoo ass”

 

I bought a dell computer and I heard many times as a child that there is a farmer in the dell. so that lil farmer guy will have to do my bidding and pony up those crops

 

as discussed in this episode of The West Wing Thing

 

it's true: although the US system does waste upwards of 40% of its food, a sizeable percentage of Americans are in the Clean Plate Club.

 

The focal shift from Russia in Europe to China in Asia is less a mechanism for coping with defeat than the pathological reaction of a country that, feeling a gnawing sense of diminishing prowess, can manage to do nothing more than try one final fling at proving to itself that it still has the right stuff — since living without that exalted sense of self is intolerable.

 

this is homework for the latest Chapo episode so you know what the fuck they're talking about when they start talking about Hasan Minhaj

 

Okay, so this is not super easy to talk about. Growing up my dad had a tall older sister Ophelia, and a short younger sister Lynne. My aunts were the ones who introduced me to leftism, and were woke about a lot of things, but Ophelia is proud that she is a slender six feet tall and constantly teased Lynne about being short (barely five feet). For years we tried with varying amounts of success to get her to stop, but one Thanksgiving after I went away to college, there was a big falling out after Ophelia made yet another nasty crack about Lynne's height— to try to score points with a new boyfriend. My dad totally lost it and threw Ophelia out of the house. Now it's more than three years since any of them have spoken.

Anyway, we lost Lynne to a fatal car accident a few days ago, and I don't know how this rift will ever be mended now that she's passed on. I tried to reach out to Ophelia, but something must have really gone wrong in the last few years of estrangement. Her outgoing answering message is all about supporting Trump and MAGA bullshit. I couldn't even leave a message I was so shocked. Is it better to just give up on her? Oh well... so much for the taller aunt left.

24
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

highlight: Zeldisney claims Putin wants to restore the USSR

The Russian president has a habit of creating “frozen conflicts” on Russia’s borders (in Georgia, for example), not as ends in themselves but because his goal is to “restore the Soviet Union”.

view more: ‹ prev next ›