eendjes

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Yeah this feels like a strange combo. Like it’s one of those meals where someone added meat because all meals must have them.

The toasts look great tho.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

In the Netherlands, I want to say that Apple Maps is actually better than Google… but only if you’re driving.

For some insane reason they don’t have biking maps here (or at least in all the places I’ve tried) which is such an enormous blunder.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah. It’s a nice concept, I even think 7th Continent could be nice if they redid the rules. A vague booklet and a half hour long YouTube video is not sufficient, especially since I can’t easily look stuff up in the video. (And let’s be honest I don’t wanna watch YouTube videos when I’m playing a board game either!)

Let’s hope Citadel fixes all that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It really is. Luckily it’s a skill that can be trained.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I’ve only skimmed your comments, but I think a factor is also that a lot of them are really hard to read.

Examples I see are weird sentence structure, the lack of paragraphs for longer messages, the lack of capitalisation, and rather odd/hyperbolic use of words (writing in the same way you’d speak?). This “style” just gets interpreted as “noise” when I’m reading it, which will get downvoted as it doesn’t contribute.

English isn’t my first language either (it’s not even my second or third!) so I understand it’s very hard to get these things right. But without sufficient clarity you will get downvotes, as it just comes off as noise.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

Yeah same. I see a mix of positive and negative.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

For me it would probably be “7th continent”. It just feels a bit undercooked and the rules are vague in a way that’s really frustrating. People really like it on BGG but I don’t get it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oppvarming av elv og sjø er en faktor, men du kan ikke bygge kjernekraft hvor det ikke er en (betydelig) kilde vann. Det kan du med vind. Så jeg sier ja takk, begge deler.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

At noe ikke-fornybar energi må brukes for fornybare ressurser er ikke nødvendigvis et argument imot fornybare kilder. Vi bygger heller ikke vasskraft eller geotermalske kraftverk ut av resirkulert papp og gamle klær. Det er et stort og vanskelig regnestykke, for hva som er bærekraftig energi.

At vind ikke er regulerbart er forsåvidt sant, men vi har en rimelig forventning av vind. Det er ikke slik at plutselig har et år med 80% mindre vind. Og selv om vinden kan komme til unyttige tider, kan msn bruke pumper som fyller reservoarer med vann, som et slags «batteri» av potensiell energi for når det er mest nyttig.

Jeg selv er også stor tilhenger av atomkraft men jeg tror vi bygger vindmøller i midten av Oslo sentrum før vi bygger atomkraft i Norge.

Videre, hvorfor ikke begge? Kjernekraft kan ikke bygges hvor som helst grunnet kjøling. Der er vind mye mer fleksibelt.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Staat dat het vanwege minder vracht en dalende tarieven zijn. Dat verbaast mij eigenlijk niet, ik ken bijna niemand die goede ervaring heeft met DHL (inclusief mijzelf). Op dit moment bestel ik niet meer dingen als DHL de enige keuze zijn.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure, had plenty worse but I feel by modern standards it can be quite frustrating at times.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Score! Yeah, it’s a concern for mine too. Thanks for sharing!

view more: ‹ prev next ›