dgerard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

ahem Little Big

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (8 children)

quite amazing that (a) Microsoft basically bought open source with GitHub (b) and are now trying to fuck it up so hard people leave

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

new Ziz story, coupla days ago https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/ziz-rationalism-lasota-pasek-20323332.php

also featuring our old friend Zack Davis

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

a shitload i expect. but checking authorities actually exist is probably gonna become an obvious thing to do lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I mean this post seems largely correct and reasonable, but ehh be a little cautious

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

word i hear is that too many lawyers fucking love this shit, they see plausible words and think that's sufficient to ~~replace~~ supplement the office peons

then this happens to them and lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you're after streams-crossing - this guy is a rationalist who does Manifold Markets

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

finally we have constructed a completely unsexy robot

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

someone said it was Kendrick and Drake, i thought it was two Drakes pointing at each other

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it will explain its position with interpretive twerking

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Egan already told Hanson to fuck off in a previous story, Zendegi:

"My IQ is one hundred and sixty ... You can always reach me through my blog, Overpowering Falsehood dot com, the number one site for rational thinking about the future —"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

jwz gave the game away, so i'll reveal:

the One Weird Trick for this week is that the bots pretend to be an old version of Chrome. So you can block on useragent

so I blocked old Chrome from hitting the expensive mediawiki call on rationalwiki and took our load average from 35 (unusable) to 0.8 (schweeet)

caution! this also blocks the archive sites, which pretend to be old chrome. I refined it to only block the expensive query on mediawiki, vary as appropriate.

nginx code:

        # block some bot UAs for complex requests
        # nginx doesn't do nested if, so we set a test variable
        # if $BOT is both Complex and Old, block as bot
        set $BOT "";
        if ($uri ~* (/w/index.php)) {
            set $BOT "C"; }

            if ($http_user_agent ~* (Chrome/[2-9])) {
                set $BOT "${BOT}O";}
            if ($http_user_agent ~* (Chrome/1[012])) {
                set $BOT "${BOT}O";}
            if ($http_user_agent ~* (Firefox/3)) {
                set $BOT "${BOT}O";}
            if ($http_user_agent ~* (MSIE)) {
                set $BOT "${BOT}O";}

            if ($BOT = "CO") {
                return 503;}

you always return "503" not "403", because 403 says "fuck off" but the scrapers are used to seeing 503 from servers they've flattened.

I give this trick at least another week.

24
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

As spotted by @mountainriver

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXc9-oD_iFo - video

 

Thinking about how the arsing fuck to explain the rationalists to normal people - especially as they are now a loud public problem along multiple dimensions.

The problem is that it's all deep in the weeds. Every part of it is "it can't be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong."

With bitcoin, I have, over the years, simplified it to being a story of crooks and con men. The correct answer to "what is a blockchain and how does it work" is "it's a way to move money around out of the sight of regulators" and maybe "so it's for crooks and con men, and a small number of sincere libertarians" and don't even talk about cryptography or technology.

I dunno what the one sentence explanation is of this shit.

"The purpose of LessWrong rationality is for Yudkowsky to live forever as an emulation running on the mind of the AI God" is completely true, is the purpose of the whole thing, and is also WTF.

Maybe that and "so he started what turned into a cult and a series of cults"? At this point I'm piling up the absurdities again.

The Behind The Bastards approach to all these guys has been "wow these guys are all so wacky haha and also they're evil."

How would you first approach explaining this shit past "it can't be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong"?

[also posted in sneer classic]

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7DZZuCi95o - video

my delivery was near perfect on this video, i'm very pleased

view more: ‹ prev next ›