dbilitated

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

3-2-1 is for backup, RAID is also for availability, eg your domain server not going down in case of drive failure. good point though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yeah but if SSD failing is now less likely that other parts of the machine it might be better to focus on a redundant server to fail over to.. it's an interesting thought. RAID isn't obsolete I don't think but it's an interesting question

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I do recall google apparently stopped using raid in some data centres, but it was because they had whole-machine redundancy.

RAID is probably redundant for some of the uses it used to have, like optimising read performance by using many drives (SSD is fast) and honestly I suspect that SSDs are probably more reliable as they don't have a bunch of platters and bearings and screaming rotational speeds.

So if you needed it for a base level of reliability, an SSD on its own may have exceeded that.

I suspect there are still uses for drive redundancy in some high availability setups.. although your friend might be right. If the likelihood of drive failure is lower than other parts in the machine and you need high redundancy for availability it might make more sense to replicate the whole machine rather than the drives.

It's possible redundancy specifically for the drives was an artifact of unreliable drives back in the day 🤔 they might have a point! I think it's likely still useful at times though.

I'd rather hotswap a drive than set up a new server, even if it's a less likely scenario.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

that is genuinely beautiful

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

huh I didn't think the US could have even less credibility on war crimes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

hell of a promotional tour

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Snowden later made contact with Glenn Greenwald, a journalist working at The Guardian.[111] He contacted Greenwald anonymously as "Cincinnatus"[112][113] and said he had sensitive documents that he would like to share.[114] Greenwald found the measures that the source asked him to take to secure their communications, such as encrypting email, too annoying to employ. Snowden then contacted

what the fuck, Glenn.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

oh wow that adorable, belligerent face. absolutely knows what he's stealing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/z_EmuZyhqMU

it's 4 hours so you might actually finish it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if they knew it was legit why didn't they just say nothing? it's weird Putin is on record saying it won't happen, right before it happened. makes him look stupid.

tbh though I'd be surprised if they genuinely had no idea, how can their intelligence be so much worse in their own country?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Head to Bali, smoking cuban cigars, And we fuck up the party like acoustic guitars

"fuck up the party like acoustic guitars" always cracked me up so much.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

it's more, we'll hold up a ceasefire by adding conditions for Israel while thousands of Palestinians are dying of hunger or simply shot. I think the hostages should be returned but that should simply be another negotiation.

Personally I think the hostage release and condemning the initial act are fine but both sides holding up a ceasefire based on those details is terrible. People are dying at a sickening rate.

view more: ‹ prev next ›