Germans said the same in 1938
db0
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
"Having manual ways to remove csam" means almost nothing. All of lemmy has a "manual way to remove csam". "closely working with NCMEC" can mean they just use the cloudflare mechanism which is just hash matching. Point is, it's very easy for a malicious actor to upload csam and then report them to patreon for it, without ever reporting it to them.
Sorry your links don't work it seems. Maybe those posts were deleted.
In any case, if their "automated" is just hash matching, it's just not going to cut it.
Crossposting from the other thread
I wonder what kind of of csam detection they have. If they're only relying on hash matching, they've gonna get fucked from novel genai csam. This is why stuff like the fedi-safety exists which they could use as well
I wonder what kind of of csam detection they have. If they're only relying on hash matching, they've gonna get fucked from novel genai csam. This is why stuff like the fedi-safety exists which they could use as well
Are you lost? Or what is this related to? :D
This has wildly more impact than anything you're doing and what most people like you are doing (voting for more genocide)
I just asked my wife and she made the face. This is apparently, correct 😂😬😂
Goddamn that takes me back!
Basically: Musk bribed trump a cool 250 mil, to go in and personally destroy all the regulatory agencies that would regulate his companies. His task now done, he goes back to ranting on Twitter.
This one requires a bit of background.:
Hexbears keep opening the_dunk_tank posts about our mods and our instance in violation of their own comm rules. That compels me to go in them and try to correct the bad faith disinformation being peddled about us.
In one such thread one commenter made a reply to me ending it with "disengage", which was a clear indication they didn't want to engage in discussion any more, which I respected.
Note that there's no indication of how disengagement works in any sidebars. And even their own Code of Conduct, merely states:
So it appeared to me this is how it works.
Later in the thread, someone kept making bad faith replies and at some point I thought, "I'll just use this handy disengage rule to avoid being further provoked". So I did, at which point I was gleefully and summarily banned by the mod with the following comment, to which I couldn't respond anymore of course.
Now I knew already that plenty of hexbears had a grudge against me for rejecting "left unity", so they were just looking for an excuse to get rid of me, they finally found enough of a plausible gotcha and all they could think of for the reason was "liberal". Note that the first person "abusing the disengage rule" was never banned or affected in any way.
Ultimately this led me to being banned from hexbear itself, but that's a post for another day.
So what do you think? Am I "liberal "enough to deserve a ban for "abusing" an unwritten disengage rule. Power trippin' mod or nah?
Hosts transphobes and TERFs and probably worse.
See this thread: https://linuxrocks.online/@yisraeldov/112907845197730688
This is the kind of "discussions" they're hosting
You might want to block this instance if you don't want your users to have to constantly argue their own existence. At least you might want to hesitate/silence the instance to prevent their debatebros from randomly slipping in your replies. Just my take.
I once prevented throwing out a broken electric toothbrush for a year
Then removes the post itself for "misinfo".
Suffice to say I think that the mod was just salty that I posted something that was not praising Russia, idfk what they were thinking.
Link to OP: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/25545288
What do you think, is me telling a regular that they're not prescient, banworthy "chauvinism"? Power trippin' bastard or nah?
lol who said anything about "pick up a gun and run around shooting people". Y'all are erecting some mighty tall strawmen.