Unless more evidence appears, I'm more inclined to believe the person who didn't shoot anyone, even when they had plenty of opportunity to do so (in self defense no less) and have a history of protecting others.
db0
Ye which is why I'm inclined to believe the non-killer's story rather than the ones with the most incentive to lie
The victim blaming with assumed narratives no less, is astounding.
We require a valid email for registration as an anti-spam measure, but you can garble the email afterwards.
A single blurry still doesn't pose a convincing argument that he was or wasn't pointing the weapon towards the crowds.
We don't go around making plausible reasons and then asking the victim to prove them wrong. Maybe the killers are lying to cover their ass?
Facts on the ground is: Arturo didn't shoot anyone, had a right to carry, a bystander was killed by the "good guys" and Arturo was shot himself. Nothing in all of this proves that Arturo was a danger to anyone.
Maybe he panicked? Maybe he didn't want to hit bystanders. None of us have been shot before, but from all I know, all rational thought easily goes out the window.
Israel’s element of surprise was enhanced by Iranian officials’ apparent assumption that Israel wouldn’t attack while talks over its rapidly advancing nuclear program were ongoing with the U.S.
That smells like a "he's coming right for us" bullshit report.
I had something similar in Germany.
Yes, unfortunately this is why the software itself enforces such rigid hierarchies.
posting anti-tankie and anti-electoralism stuff in an Anarchism comm is one of the easiest way to generate infinite salt.
Do you know just how unreliable witness reports in traumatic situations are? We have no clue what actually happened.