db0

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] db0 4 points 1 month ago
[–] db0 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You're not, except you do.

Oh, so I'm not just disengaging like a "coward" then?

Do you really expect me to believe you simply find it tiresome talking to us when you'll reply to everything you think you can argue back about?

Yes. As I've said elsewhere,I'm autistic and I can't always help myself. Y'all are indeed extremely tiresome and I hate that I can't just ignore your shit takes. And of course when I try to manage my compulsions by disengaging in advance, I get clever gotchas like yours goading me as a "coward" instead.

Look, I know you keep loudly screaming this, but it's only you

Just. Absolute. Lol. The delusions on MLs never cease to amaze me.

but you say you don't believe in it because of ML's behaviours

Pray tell, which exact ML behaviours do you think make me disbelieve in left unity? Do you think it's because of rude MLs online or something else?

YOU are the one acting against left unity, while saying it's MLs who act against it.

I am acting against left unity because I disbelieve it. You act against left unity because ??? Don't tell me, I know, I'm actually a "lib" and therefore it doesn't apply.

I don't "hate" left unity, sweaty, I just don't believe in it.

[–] db0 3 points 1 month ago
[–] db0 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I'm not happy with a system that will revert to capitalism at all. I just think the material conditions are not always the same where anarchists won't come ahead against the counter-revolution, and when they do, they won't collapse through their own internal contradictions like ML regimes.

[–] db0 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's the thing, I don't think there's anything to divide. Anarchists have not been united with MLs since the first international. We just have non-compatible praxis and our actions will lead to severely different results. I think it's important to remind people of that now and then. I'm OK with working with MLs who follow anarchist praxis, but I also know we must remain vigilant for entryism and takeovers of our orgs.

[–] db0 6 points 1 month ago
[–] db0 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

spam is spam. We'll deal with it like any other spam.

[–] db0 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Capitalist propaganda has been very effective when things were going up in the everything bubble, but these things quickly change as the system instabilities accumulate. Ultimately it doesn't matter if "the left is getting owned". Acting prefiguratively does improve our lives in the here and now so we just keep agitating for those methods, that's the beauty of it.

[–] db0 2 points 1 month ago
[–] db0 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nonsequitur, of course everyone says they believe in freedom, including you, the difference is whether their actions lead to it, which the Communist Party of China's have done.

Yeah, the one party state is clear evidence of a strong democracy. 🤣

I knew there was evidence of this, I was just acting incredulous for cheap rhetorical points because I thought you're too lazy to link to evidence. Achsually pornography is illegal and furthermore imprisoned people don't count because blah blah tldr

Thanks tankie for once again showing your entire ass.

[–] db0 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yep, I don't want to help bring about a system which will only revert to capitalism on its own.

[–] db0 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Oh I didn't know I'm obliged to argue with every hexbear debatelord in order to post an anarchist meme. I engage only when I have time and motivation as can be seen in all the rest of the comments you scrolled down from to find this screenshot. So the only liar is you and likewise a classic hypocrite by labeling the disengage usage as "cowardice" when it's a core rule of hexbear as well.

You're criticising us about left unity when you started a thread specifically to be sectarian,

It's not sectarianism when we were never in the same camp.

and now you're DARVOing

Lol WTF 🙃. Do tell me what have I been hypocritical about and how did I project that onto you? Remember kids, I don't actually believe in "left unity" 😄.

What in the world makes you think we're the ones showing our asses?

The dozens of extremely salty comments showing how you treat anyone who criticizes ML regimes.

 

Lots of releases since my last post roughly 1 week ago. Suffice to say, I've been hard at work :)

  • Threativore now allows specifying a governance community. Posts in that community can be used for voting. Voting relies on the specified user tags within threativore to figure out which votes to count and which not. You can see this in action in our very first voting thread in lemmy.dbzer0.com.
  • A lot more work has gone into preparing threativore to serve tags as flairs, with flair ordering mechanisms using env var definitions
  • Two new threativore PM commands added
    • vouching for users, which gives them a special flair and allows them to participate in votes. Vouching PMs are open to all trusted uses, has controls to prevent multiple/duplicate vouching, and PMs target and source accorindly.
    • assigning/removing flair, which gives them the flair tag on threativore and PMs them accordingly. This is open only to threativore admins.

The threativore manual has been updated with all relevant information for all of these

 

That face reminds me of the "Now Kiss" meme and that's just inherently funny

For reference:

 

📊 Chainalysis put out some data claiming that at least half of all TRUMP and MELANIA #memecoin “investors” never bought a token on Solana before and most of them hold less than $200 worth while 50 "whales" have made profits of more than $10 million each, strongly suggesting that the biggest suckers in the #TrumpCoin grift are the #MAGA voter base. Feels like #JustinSun made a deal with Trump to let him fleece the MAGA base and drain money back to #China.

Here’s the Chainalysis thread with the charts: x.com/chainalysis/status/18822

I have some issues with #Chainalysis and suspect the data is actually even more damning than they’re saying… but I don’t have access to the data and what they’re saying is already extremely damning. (Kind of expect them to be forced to retract it by the company ownership because of the bad PR).

259
Why do we have hands? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 6 months ago by db0 to c/flippanarchy
 
1042
Legality (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 6 months ago by db0 to c/flippanarchy
 
719
Just misunderstood (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 6 months ago by db0 to c/flippanarchy
 
36
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by db0 to c/[email protected]
 

If so, please remove the Autism Place links on the sidebar as the instance is dead. I wouldn't mind a link to [email protected] either

38
Instance welcome message (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 6 months ago by db0 to c/div0
 

Hello once again peeps. As part of my work in categorizing and flairing users based on their registration application, I thought, "why not use the same code to have a constantly running script that checks for new applications and automatically flairs them. Then after I built that, I thought to myself "why not PM new users with their starting flair"? And, well, long story short, our instance now has a script that will automatically PM new users with a full welcome message.

The message will include the users starting flair, based on their stated favorite Anarchist, Pirate or FOSS Advocate and then will suggest some starting comms to join, based on those tags. You can see an example in the attached image.

I feel like this is a neat idea to simulate something like the bluesky starting packs. Of course since we don't quite have something like an onboarding screen, I can't finetune the suggestions too much, but at least we have something.

Let me know if you can think of any improvements to this process.

 

As I'm having to decide sometimes on whether something is on-topic or not, and we can always make mistakes, I've opened a matrix channel for YPTB for meta discussions.

If you think we locked/removed your submission in honest error, please let us know there (instead of immediately creating YTPB about us being bastards! pirate captain laughing)

le matrix

56
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by db0 to c/div0_governance
 

As mentioned in the previous post, the Governance community is now live. I have refactored my affiliations lookup script to be more accurate and have added everyone's application affiliation to their threativore flairs.

I want to say, y'all are pretty creative and keep coming up with favorites I've never heard before. I still have quite a lot of uncategorized answers to go through, but most of you have been assigned a tag.

As a way to reward people who are coming up with unique answers, the first person who registers with a new favorite, also gets the a victory cup, orangered color first emoji assigned.

A few of you seem to mention people who are neither anarchists, pirates nor foss (advocates). Usually, and unless that person is a complete reactionary or PoS, we let you through. However you don't get a first a victory cup, orangered color for that. Instead, you get a snowflake a snowflake, orangered color flair, because you're special like that 😜

Finally, quite a few people registered before we even had an application form with which to request your affiliation. So as to recognize all you early birds, I have now added a fresh flair Early Bird: a parrot, orangered colors early_bird and is something nobody else will be able to get ;) Thanks for sticking around here for the past 2 years!

So without further ado, here's the updated stats from this run. I will do another run once I've categorized everything I don't know yet

Analysis Results:
-----------------
Historical Pirate: 538 (9.9%)
Digital Pirate: 1223 (22.6%)
Fictional Character: 584 (10.8%)
FOSS advocate: 1673 (30.9%)
Free Software: 631 (11.6%)
Anarchist: 779 (14.4%)
Other: 165 (3.0%)
Unparseable: 0 (0.0%)

Total Answers Analyzed: 5420
Answers matching multiple categories: 984

Top Mentions per Category:
---------------------------
Historical Pirate: Blackbeard (286), Anne Bonny (48), Zheng Yi Sao (32)
Digital Pirate: Fitgirl (221), Aaron Swartz (205), Empress (106)
Fictional Character: Captain Jack Sparrow (252), Luffy (79), Dread Pirate Robers (54)
FOSS advocate: Linus Torvalds (566), Richard Stallman (476), Louis Rossmann (116)
Free Software: Lemmy (351), Linux (188), Gnu (39)
Anarchist: Emma Goldman (113), Kropotkin (98), Chomsky (66)
Other: Elon Musk (30), Openai (20), O'Reilly (19)

Btw: I've set up this thread in governance for a reason. If you leave a comment here, the bot will reply to you, with your list of flairs. (Still waiting for a UI designer to step up and integrate them on the UI itself 😅)

If you think I've made a mistake with your flairs, let me know.

  • governance type: sense check
  • show all flair
view more: ‹ prev next ›