What the fuck is bad::s supposed to mean!?
darklamer
When they inevitably reboot Bond, it would be cool to see period adaptations of all the Fleming novels.
That'd be very cool, and it'd make me very happy if they started with making a seriously good adaptation of Moonraker.
I'd say Moonraker, which might be my favourite of the first books, but the movie adaptation keeps little more than the title and changes pretty much everything else (and as a result ends up being quite bad, receiving noticeably lukewarm reviews and nowadays often appearing in lists of worst Bond films ever).
Any product that is perforated to tear easily, 9 times out of 10 they fucked it up and the perforations may as well not even be there or even make it worse
Interesting — I've always assumed that this was deliberate, in order to increase waste (and thereby sales). Do you really think that it's because of something innocuous like incompetence or inattention?
The magnet dislikes you personally, that's why.
Never wear a hat you haven't grown yourself.
to more obscure and risky providers who don't care about the law instead
There's no need to go that far, there will still be plenty of well-known and trustworthy providers who care about the law but simply operate outside of UK jurisdiction.
Sydney Sweeney
That seems like a very safe bet:
Dame Rachel told BBC Newsnight: "Of course, we need age verification on VPNs - it's absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that's one of my major recommendations."
Debian, of course.
That's a misunderstanding on your part.