It's not the systems alone. It's the multiplication of systems per number of humans.
Too many humans even with paleolithic lifestyle will fuck up the environment anyway.
We need to find a balance, what systems we do we want to live in and how many humans can that system accommodate.
I count denuvo or kernel anticheat as malware. And the probability to get those from a legal site are really high.
Go here: https://crackmes.one/ download a crackme challenge and try to crack it.
Then pick a screen recorder and try to record your screen for a few hours.
You'll see one is way easier than another.
Cracking requires to reverse engineering the executable. Which can get quite complex.
If the game is not drm protected or the drm have been cracked then the pirated copy will also come quickly.
Petition?
No, no, they should be legally enforced to do so.
System breaking errors that doesn't allow you to even login?
Windows have lots of issues, but it's been a while since I found those system breaking issues to be somehow common.
For all their shit, credit myst be given when credit is due. And windows it's become a really robust systems against layer 8 issues. Even powering off middle update is kind of easy to recover (I have to solve this issue for a user recently).
NASA is such a gift to the world.
Let's hope it can survive this administration.
Because it reads more like advertisement of a paid product than news.
You can be rewarded with the honor of paying a monthly subscription.
Another chatgpt wrapper sold as gold subscription.
That's my bet.
Once again the survival of the species is not on the line because of that.
That's just an excuse you are making to justify a hate that has other roots.
Prove is in the complete disregard of proposed solutions: remote work, decentralized offices, traffic reduction instead of complete suppression, population reduction... And apparently disregard for other forms of pollution that could be reduced or eliminated instead, for instance, international traveling, or traveling at all, maybe people living in cities should never visit nature or different places, that travel will destroy the world!
not everyone have to live the way you enjoy living. Diversity is good.
I could say. Because I know international travel is polluting and I don't like it let's put a global ban on international traveling. No one is allow to travel. Probably people who enjoy traveling (you might be among them) will be furious against me and it would be dictator like from me trying to take that away from them.
No. Environment should never be a excuse to have a dictator like mindset of just depriving people of their lifestyles. That will be fight against, and people fighting that away would be on the right side of story.
Once again, we are a clever species. Surely we can find a way to make diverse lifestyles work. I completely disagree with your radical posture that that lifestyle is imposible to have without human extinction. You completely disregard that things like remote work or decentralized offices exist. The solutions already exist. It would be matter of expanding them to reduce the amount of people needing daily commute.
Now even you say all suburbia have to go too. That's type of close-minded extremism should never be the beam that guides the future of humankind. It would be a sad future. Let people be free to live in suburbia if they want, let people to life in a rural area if they want. At this point the only think that's not a valid life choice here is your intention to oppress everyone into the only lifestyle you consider "valid".
And I'm pretty sure that the environment is nothing but a excuse here. It would be nice to disclose the true reasons for the hate towards people who doesn't live in cities.
That's the top pc you can buy nowadays, yes. Best consumer grade cpu and gpu, the rest of the specs are on par. Nice build.