daniskarma

joined 1 year ago
[–] daniskarma 4 points 2 weeks ago

Sort of. They were predicted by Einstein theories. But in a way so absurd that it was supposed to be just a faulty part of the theory when you push it to a extreme. Basically the "infinite collapse" that occurs and that should put all mass in a infinitely small space.

That cannot be true, it collides with quantum theory.

We have observed the space surrounding black holes, and that is spot on with the theory. But we know nothing about what occurs inside them. We don't know the density of the singularity, it's structure, how that matter behaves at quantum levels. We know nothing about that.

Once you enter a black hole is not only that you would be torn to pieces and pieces to atoms, we don't even know if atom structure would even exist in there. Maybe even boson-fermion structure doesn't even exist inside a black hole.

[–] daniskarma 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I tried MX Linux recently because of that.

It's nice but not my style. Specially the systemd thing. Trying to support both with and without with somehow more emphasis in "without" systemd.

But it works quite good as a OS in a pendrive thingy. I has good default tools for that.

[–] daniskarma 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Brain to memory encryption is going to be banned in the EU by next year. It will save the children or something.

[–] daniskarma 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Why everything needs to be score to begin with?

Maybe be a cultural thing with the USA. Around here (south europe) I don't feel like people keep track of that things as a score.

[–] daniskarma 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Different things.

The singularity of a black hole is located in space.

The initial singularity of the big bag happened "everywhere" the whole universe was supposed to have infinite density.

The mass of the black hole is finite. It's very dense but it have a quantifiable amount of mass.

For the big bang the mass was also infinite as far as we know. Everything was singularity, every "energy" in your body was part of that infinitely large singularity. Not only everything but everywhere. Where you sit there was singularity during the big bang. As far as we know every single point in space was part of the initial singularity. We don't come from a single point that exploded towards empty space. Expansion is more like the surface of a balloon. Maybe it's better to think of it as stretching rather than expanding.

Beyond that we don't know much about both, there are barriers which prevent direct observation of both.

The expansion of the universe is a completely different matter, as it's not only expanding, it's expanding faster that out gravitational models predict, like the universe is not only "ignoring" black holes, it's expanding despite all observable matter, and all untraceable matter (dark matter), and it's expanding faster and faster driven by an unknown phenomenon we call "dark energy" for giving it a name, because we have remotely not idea of what's going on.

[–] daniskarma 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They are like stars in the sense of orbital mechanics.

But a star can be completely understood by the laws of physics we know. While a black hole breaks our understanding and we have no idea what's going on in there.

It's the fear of the unknown.

[–] daniskarma 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The original comment were referring to the ring singularity which is different from the accretion disk.

The singularity is unseen, we suppose it's a ring in rotating back holes, but we have no idea. As anything inside the event horizon, we cannot see what's going on in there.

The accretion disk is the disk of matter falling into the black hole, it's outside the event horizon and can be observed.

[–] daniskarma 8 points 2 weeks ago

No. Why would you let the nazis to appropriate anything they want?

Do a reverse uno card and go appropriate some of their shit. Like antifastonetoss. Take everything out of their hands.

[–] daniskarma 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Until what age do you pretend to live?

[–] daniskarma 22 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair they never cared about environment. A paper is something easy to recycle and certainly not the most polluting material to produce.

It was more about saving money, greenwashing and pushing a conversion towards digital archiving (which is much more efficient that paper)

[–] daniskarma 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

People are against it because several reasons.

First because it's a very specific taste/opinion that they don't share. You are saying that "all would be more appealing without softcore porn", but it seems that you are the only one who thinks that here, most people don't care or even like it. We could also put a filter to blurry dog pictures for people scare of dogs, where does it end? Until which point personal tastes should have their own explicit filters? It ends in a "word filter" which is already usable.

Also I would say that most people is against this because it reads as a first step towards a "porn ban". We have no puritan advertisements or pay processor to please. People here like the freedom. And that would be a step in the opposite direction. It reads a little like so many discourses we are seeing in so many places to make them "family friendly" and to "protect the children". I would suppose that due the nature of the fediverse (which is a push back against those people controlling our internet) is against anything that looks like that.

[–] daniskarma 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Can you get that on any family member or a stranger just by asking for it?

Really?

view more: ‹ prev next ›