curbstickle

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] curbstickle 94 points 4 months ago (19 children)

Its horrendous, my work windows laptop the amount of crap just loading at startup is getting stupid.

[–] curbstickle 14 points 4 months ago

I.... Disagree.

I now want to look like that always. Time to raid the wife's makeup stash!

[–] curbstickle 2 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Goodbye permanently.

[–] curbstickle 4 points 4 months ago (7 children)

You should probably re-read what I said, you seem to be missing the italicized or in there.

Anyway, enjoy your day. You have zero chance of convincing me that this is anything other than the latest cash grab. Its why they've been going downhill for years - features no one asked for that exclusively provide them profit options, usually breaking something else.

Goodbye.

[–] curbstickle 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (9 children)

The drastic changes in limits are a cash grab.

There is now a subscription requirement for the server owners or the users. This is not a Plex Pass only approach, there is a Watch subscription as well.

It is a cash grab. Its also not their first, and won't be their last.

Its why I use JF despite being a lifetime Plex pass subscriber.

[–] curbstickle 4 points 4 months ago (11 children)

I'm not, but also as I pointed out thats already irrelevant to me. I have a lifetime subscription, and have for a loooonnggg time.

That doesnt make it any less of a shitty cash grab just because it doesnt impact me at all.

[–] curbstickle 5 points 4 months ago (13 children)

I do.

And I wasn't bitching about Plex. This was my first comment in this thread.

That said, I'm also a lifetime Plex Pass subscriber, since waaaayyyyy back. And I'll add that this is clearly a shitty money grab, and Plex deserves the complaints.

[–] curbstickle 7 points 4 months ago (15 children)

It most definitely does.

Jellyfin doesnt give a shit about where the server is in the slightest.

[–] curbstickle 91 points 4 months ago

Its never a waste to do the right thing.

[–] curbstickle 9 points 4 months ago

I believe the answer there is - two living at any given time.

[–] curbstickle 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because its the opposite actually. Circumcision reduces risk, inclusive of STIs as well as UTIs. Its a significant, but partial, reduction in risk. This has only been shown with PiV sexual activity and not with PiA sexual activity, which could be an important factor.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8579597/

Adult circumcision works out well, including for a family member who did it in his 30s due to severe phimosis (which is also linked to penile carcinoma).

I think the only appropriate answer to circumcision is not at birth, only for a clear medical need until they are an adult, and at that point it's their decision.

But I doubt you'll find anything peer reviewed that suggests an increase in STIs after circumcision, I've only ever seen the opposite, and I did a lot of reading on it before my son was born.

[–] curbstickle 9 points 4 months ago

Since the recent UK court ruling is absolutely not applicable to this situation, and they've given no other reasoning for a decision being delayed on this matter, I don't feel it would be reasonable for the comments to still be up.

100% agreed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›