csh83669

joined 2 years ago
[–] csh83669@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I just graced with a glorious 0-day work week. There is no chance ANY of this “productivity” will get anywhere near workers. It’s just a new, exciting way to centralize wealth and power. And if the models get as “intelligent” as the claim they will in 5 years, then with a helping of slavery to boot, ones they are “as smart or smarter” than humans, just without pesky things like rights…

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. This was what finally got me to bite the bullet and cancel prime.now my impulse shopping is way down too, since I get to think “do I want to wait 4 days for this”? So win win in my book.

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why bother with years, it’s day 1,456,7834

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago

I mean, it’s not like it’s a big conspiracy. LLM’s are just GIANT and expensive text predictors. They don’t “understand” or “know” anything. They just grabbed some off the shelf model that had a millions piece of training data that looked vaguely like “be polite, don’t pin blame” and then that was mushed with a bunch or Anne frank books. The resulting bastard child is this clueless, generic nothing burger that’s slightly predisposed to plagiarizing Anne Frank’s words if the stuff it was asked vaguely looks like something in its training data.

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

My concern is basically that this forces people to use very expensive cert providers, since it is infeasible to setup and connect and secure an HSM that can do this yourself. And Microsoft and Amazon have tricked the browser forums that their online ones are good enough.

It essentially puts yet another monopoly into the “open” Web. The CA browser forum is a joke at this point and I don’t respect any of the decision in the last 10 years. They all serve to further centralize and close off the web.

People keep bringing up LetsEncrypt, but it very much cannot issue EV carts. It costs THOUSANDS of dollars to use a service that can auto renew “trusted certs”.

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

I have something that looks like that. Mine is a bone mounted hearing aid. Usually there’s a little device plugged into it.

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

At which point if I'm expected to give a dollar to each of them, then I'm basically screwed. I've seen some licenses trying to claim "1% of your revenue if you use my package"... But if I use 1000 of them I now owe 10x my revenue to a bunch of "leftpad" libraries?

Or am I somehow supposed to give like... 10000 3 penny donations? How would that even work? The costs to "donate" a dollar to someone with modern banking (once the CC and whatever donation site takes their cut) almost makes it not worth it.

Especially once indirect dependencies get pulled in (which is a large part of the FOSS ecosystem... tons of people use ffmpeg without ever realizing they are) how does that work? If I use a library, and that library suddenly adds 20 more dependencies, do I need to shell out $20? Or am I as a maintainer supposed to divvy up any donations I get to every library I used (I bet you used a compiler to build whatever your tool is).

It's rough, and I don't see it really working for anything but a few special snowflake projects. It's just not workable at the scale FOSS has turned into. A blessing a curse I suppose.

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this true? All the news I’ve seen is that Wade resigned but Willis will stay on. If they both quit, that’s huge news I would expect someone to be reporting.

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think this article makes a pretty big leap in the middle. There's really no reason that the operating system needs to be involved in the "Private" solution. It could just as easily be a website or a browser plugin. All you need is your government of choice to have some way to provide a token with whatever important bits necessary in it ("Yes this person is over 18 and a resident of WA"). You could even have third party sites/libraries that could read that token and verify what it contains.

The last third of the article is all based on that giant leap.

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago (10 children)

The example for me immediately showed my overlap bug with “eightwo”. There aren’t too many other ways to make this ten words overlap. 🙂

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

I would say absolutely. The 2004 series one of my favorite series, even if I find the end tapers of in quality in my opinion. Otherwise it’s great. Give it a watch.

[–] csh83669@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

That sounds like indifference to me. They are “fine” with wrecking stuff, but that’s not their goal. Their goal is more power, more money, more… whatever. They are 100% indifferent to the countries welfare. At least that’s what it feels like to me. It’s definitely still bad, as indifference to other peoples suffering is a pretty crappy way to be.

view more: next ›