crystal

uses a modern Notebook which is QubesOS certified and runs coreboot

You seem to be missing my point.

This tool would not increase censorship.

Admins are already able to implement all censorship they want.

Admins are already able to block left-wing opinions, right-wing opinions, child porn, normal porn.

And that already happens.

Lots of instances (like feddit.de) block pornographic content.

Lots of instances (like lemmy.blahaj.zone) block right-wing content.

It is already possible, and it is already happening.

An AI which can detect CSAM (and potentially other content) won't change that. It will simply make the admins' job easier.

I don't know how you get the impression that this increases censorship.

Instance admin already manually block content. And they are already able to do that to any extend they wish to do.

This tool would simply automate that process.

Admins would not gain or lose any ability to block content. Identifying child porn would simply be easier.

(Imagine an admin going to their database and doing a CTRL+F with the term "child porn", and then going through the posts to find offending ones. But instead of CTRL+F it's an AI.)

(For some reason I don't get a notification when you answer my comment. Is that a known issue? Did you block me or something?)

Why does the chart not include purple?

South America is not "mainland of America"? What do you consider "mainland of America" if south America is not part of it?

A. If you want to hop you can already just create a new account. What's the issue with taking ownership of your posts with you?

B. Just migrate the salt, too. A server can have per-user salts, which may be migrated together with the hash.

C. If you already have control over someone else's account, what additional benefit does migrating serve?

I'd be like "Oh boy let me get redirected to lots of useful answers to my question next time too".

I don't understand why you would frame that as being "slapped". Does having your question marked as a duplicate hurt your feelings?

That's not the point. Yes, child porn sites can host child porn. Other sites/instances can't stop that. But what other instances can stop, is redistributing said child porn. And for that purpose, such technology would be useful.

You moved the period in the wrong direction. It's 0.034462%.

Isn't it a good thing if your question is marked as a duplicate? That means you now have lots of answers readily available which already answered the question.

You think I'm "trying to sow division and infighting among the working class"?

Try taking off your tinfoil hat for a while.

Decadent lifestile compared to the people whose products you buy because you "can't afford" to pay people in your own country.

Guess why products produced in your own country cost so much? Because the workers there get paid lots of money (when compared to the rest of the world).