What makes you say this? The parental controls are pretty good. Just don't give access to age range stuff that you feel the kid isn't ready for. And turn off the chat. The only thing that bothers me is some of the annoying sounds some of the experiences use.
Well let's see... Here's a few from this thread:
There are many other signs also, but this is just some that may be helpful. Bear in mind that someone can have any of those things and not be autistic, but when they have a bunch of them together, they're probably autistic.
What it means to be autistic. What makes this more fun is how much learning about autism has essentially become a special interest of mine. The amount of responses in this thread that scream unrealized autistic is very high. :D
Intentionally buying from black owned businesses does not perpetuate a racist white man that is in a position of power that allows him to deny black people economic power.
The most impactful racism, that is also the hardest to fix, is systemic racism. I think the idea behind buying from black owned businesses is the individuals attempt to offset the systemic racism that they, individually, can do very little about.
My pro has 2 ports.
Well then, at least give me 2 more USB C on the other side.
My point is that she can be @taylorswift.com not @[email protected]. Also, exaggerating the number of illiterate people in the USA doesn't help your argument. You can already be @FaylorSwift on twitter so I'm still not seeing how this is any more secure than using her actual domain that her fans may be familiar with.
Eh, anyone with their own domain can use it even without hosting anything. It just takes a DNS record. So Taylor Swift can have @taylorswift.com or w/e her official website is and that's pretty much the exact same situation as claiming domain ownership. Someone else could likely register taylorswift.boats but I think most people would realize something is off there.
For me, there is far more content available if I want to doom scroll, especially about a particular topic.
Look, I recognize that it's possible for LLMs to produce code that is literally someone else's copyrighted code. However, the way I use copilot is almost exclusively to autocomplete my thoughts. Like, I write enough code until it guesses what I was about to write next. If that happens to be open source code that someone else has written, then it is complete coincidence that I thought of writing that code. Not all thoughts are original.
Further, whether I should be at fault for LLM vendors who may be breaking copyright law, is like trying to make a case for me being at fault for murder because I drive a car when car manufacturers lobby to the effect that people die more.
I'm in the exact same boat. I didn't learn in school until 4th grade but I'm thinking about asking my son's school about it before then.