cedeho

No, I do not justify bombing civilian infrastructure. I do try to explain why civilian casualties are too high. While Hamas should not use civilians as human shields, Israel should not bomb them non the less and disregard civilian casualties. It's both wrong.

Wow. Now the instance I am coming is the point of debate. Honestly, you are not interested in any honest discussion after all. I don't have any political agenda with me like you obviously do.

All I do is wish for war and terrorism to end and this needs democratic processes and independent press after all. This is my point.

I don't want to justify, all I am looking for is a discussion. I could not provide a solution either and I do not support war. All I am saying is that I don't know what to expect from a country to do.

I do not excuse killing of civilians or even genocide and personally think that Israel should take more care about civilians which is even in alignment with the statement of Mr. Blinken. Also they may rightfully be criticized in relation to blocking humanitarian aid to Gaza.

All I do say is that unbased information is hard to come by at this stage as the information sphere from inside Gaza is mostly controlled by Hamas. Israel surely is no unbiased source of news either, but international press has more access there. Again I do not neglect nor justify killing civilians and especially children. But still it should be distinguished between actual genocide which includes intentionally deporting and killing civilians and collateral damage, both of which are to condemn, as are the actions of Hamas relating to raiding and terrorizing Israel civilians and taking them hostage. This is no way of deescalation obviously either.

I don't deny anything? I am looking for information. What about you?

Care to provide a link or smth?

I appreciate your attempt to bring rationality and reason to the discussion, but you're wasting your time on this shithole.

yeah, I realized this half way through typing but wanted to finish this anyway.