I agree that Russia wouldn't stand a chance against NATO, but that's because NATO is well funded. Spending money on the military is expensive, but not as expensive as Russia invading.
caboose2006
joined 7 months ago
Even if it wasn't the 40 planes claimed, even if it's only the 5 we saw in the video , this is huge. Now Russia has to move MORE anti air assets, and more men, to these airfields and away from the front. Some bombers will be moved farther away, reducing the pace of operations. And if they have to start building bunkers for their big bombers that's tens of thousands of tons of concrete not going to buildings fortifications on the front lines. Not going to road repair. Not going to factories. And that's thousands of workers not doing other, more productive things. The success of this operation cannot be overstated
What Marco Rubio does in the privacy of his bedroom is his business.
That's a keeper.
Do what you love and you'll never work a day in your life.
Yep, being a mom is more than just contributing the egg. It's a whole litany of other actions every day.
And here's the other thing. It's not the 1800s. Russia has a nuclear triad. Wtf is a buffer state for again exactly?
The one good executive order to come out of that bag of puss
So if the Russia sycophants use "NATO on their doorstep" as an excuse to forget Russia to invade ukraine wouldn't this build-up on the border of a NATO country give NATO the same excuse? I'm sorry I have trouble keeping up with the "logic" of Russia apologists.
Why does everyone think "ancestors" means medieval? The people I never met in the 1800s are ancestors too. So "Um ahkchually" right back at ya
We should also put "communism" in quotations too.