You're right, let me rephrase that. The US is the only NATO country with living experience in invading non-neighboring countries with current methods, doctrines and technologies. That's not a simple thing to do and that know-how is extremely valuable if you want to invade someone else.
brad_troika
joined 8 months ago
US arms are still flowing to Ukraine and the sanctions against Russia still stand. I'm not saying things haven't gotten worse under Trump but it's clear that the US still has an anti-Russia policy.
Why do you think that? How would losing half the military assets and technology would benefit NATO?
Is it a copyright strike if your photograph contains a copyrighted logo?
What were the targets?
What do you mean?
It's the airbase where if I remember correctly US pilots train German and Ukrainian pilots. US pilots that unlike any other pilots in the world have actually used planes in combat situations.
Don't be too hasty to dissolve NATO. There's a difference between trying to decrease European reliance on the US military and just destroying NATO with no replacement in sight
I haven't read the original comment and don't know anything about how conversations work but would it not be easier to Google chatgpt?
It's funny. You're telling us that the technology was too complicated for some people to use, then you say we got to the point that it just works and you end with this being bad. Why do you think that?
Games with good art design are superior than "good graphics".
view more: next ›
Maybe it sucks holding the country or building new relations but it excels at invading it and did it successfully in Afghanistan as well.