boonhet

Tremendous people, the best people.

It’s significantly harder to build hot rods or street racing cars now than the way you could in the 80s and earlier.

Unless you know how to remap a car and have a car with plenty of power reserve.

Anything turbocharged can be remapped for more power unless you're at the limit of either the turbo, or the fuelling - and when you get there, many have options for more fuel and air. Diesels in particular are magic because you take a car that does ridiculous economy figures stock, and you double its power figures just to show people you can.

E.g Bobby Singh got 600 hp out of his diesel Audi wagon. These come stock with 240ish horsepower (176 kW or 239 PS I believe). He's done engine internals upgrades to this one, but on other peoples' cars he usually does bolt-on mods and gets about 400hp-500hp depending on what mods someone is willing to shell out for. Minus the upgraded internals, you could do this at home if you wanted to.

On the gasoline side, BMW has the B58 where you can get 500-600 hp with bolt-on mods and if you build it like people used to build hot rods, 1500 hp is doable. It's considered the new 2JZ because Toyota itself put it in the Supra instead of building their own successor to the 2JZ. The 2JZ itself was a supercar killer when built properly.

On the Japanese side, I'm not sure if they're doing anything fun new and new today, but they've all historically had at least one or two ridiculously tunable engines and Nissan will still sell you the very tunable GT-R.

Yes, some of those tunable newer engines come in pretty expensive cars, but there are still plenty of 4 bangers you can mod easily too. And it's not like the hot rodders typically used small engines in the past. It was usually big ass V8s that you couldn't even buy in most of the world because they used too much fuel lol

It's got to be either Russia or the US.

Uh, weren't y'all supposed to pull OUT of Gitmo?

The official stance is that nobody will ever get out of that prison alive. Literally. It's one very specific prison, and it's reduced El Salvador's violent crime rate to damn near zero because of how fucked up that prison is, and how little due process you'll receive if you even just get caught having gang tattoos. They don't need to connect you to any specific crime.

You'll share the cell with like 40 other dudes, and you all share one communal water barrel and one communal shit pit. The food is specifically designed to not be nutritious enough to sustain any muscle mass. You'll wish for death in there, but you can't even commit suicide by another inmate. Even suicide by guard is hard to pull off.

I'd honestly take the bullet over CECOT.

EU needs to pick up the CVE program. It's going to be a shitshow if we lose that.

Additional note: they also did it with some Macbooks and I can tell you it had nothing to do with battery AGE. Machines that shower either a faulty or significantly worn battery would be slow. Apple considered 80% of nominal capacity to be the limit where a battery should be replaced under warranty on those, but the slowdowns started at like 50 or 60 percent if I recall correctly. By faulty I mean devices where the system scan in AST legally said "internal fault" or something. I used to refurb Macbooks.

It was noticeable in the 2012 macbook air because that model, a weird unicorn year with components that differed from both the 2010-2011 and 2013-2017 models, would significantly slow down with a bad battery even when it was connected to AC power. Literally removing the battery made it usable again. In other model years it was never really noticeable.

I agree that nobody should trust any corpo, including Apple, but there's nuance to that story that never gets mentioned in these discussions.

Apple used to slow down devices whose batteries were starting to fail, in order to reduce the likelihood that your device suddenly turns off before the battery reads as empty. Simply put, if the battery couldn't guarantee a certain power output down until empty, they'd throttle the CPU.

The notably scummy part here is that they didn't tell users, and it wasn't an option you could change. To make up for it, they had a cheap battery replacement program for several years and informed users about the issue, and I believe it's optional now?

This was also several years before other manufacturers started offering OS support timelines comparable to Apple's. Apple still let you update a 6 year old iPhone when others were doing 3 years for flagships. Fairphone of course was an exception.

You should still get a Fairphone if it meets your actual needs or a Pixel if you need GrapheneOS, but if you're a non technical user who actually can make the most of a flagship, I'd recommend an iPhone over Samsung (just as expensive as Apple and these are the guys who put ads in TV UI nowadays) or Google (questionable stability with the Tensor chips in some iterations) at least. 5 years ago I'd recommend OnePlus, but those days are over. The stock ROM is now ass. I keep my old 7 pro around to play Real Racing 3 and with a custom rom I'm like 3 android versions beyond OEM support and it's actually super smooth. But I won't recommend it to a non techy user.

PS: I'm an Apple user, but not a diehard fan boy. I make comments explaining or defending them often because I feel Apple gets way more flak than their competitors who are usually equally scummy.

The running cost of the AI model is shared between users. cam girl donations - technically also, but if too many people donate, you get less attention personally.

Personally I'm just going to keep on watching free porn. The gambling ads at least pay out to real people instead of fossil fuel companies.

That agency apparently creates new safety regulations but doesn't do oversight. I think that's up to the courts? Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Full self driving isn't full self driving anyway. You're expected to sit in the drivers seat ready to take action anyway. Sucks that it kills people, but it's a problem with the marketing, not the tech which is comparable to other cars adaptive cruise with lane keep assist. Musk should be held fully responsible because the fact that it's a marketing issue makes it even worse to me.

True, but it sounds like she's doing it out of frustration, not a desire to retire and enjoy life outside of acting.

Either way, whatever floats her goat. If she wants to retire at 55 and spend time with her family or go travel the world or whatever, good for her. If she continues making movies, that's great too. Not everyone wants to be making movies well into their twilight years and people should respect that (I don't mean you in particular, I mean anyone who's outraged when a celebrity retires before they die rather than by dying).