boonhet

It's the age old principle of "If I can't have it, nobody can" that I'm afraid of the most. Anyone reasonable wouldn't go by it, but if Putin is afraid he's gonna die, he might as well.

It's 2025, videos don't matter anymore, definitely not to Trump.

First off we've had deepfakes for years so he could just claim that. Secondly, and this is more important, Trump's base wouldn't care anyway. They'd start off denying the whole thing, and then if it's proven to be real, they'd just say it's not that big of a deal because dems do it more and it's worse, until finally they'll say it's actually a good thing, but only when Trump does it.

Honestly, I think Putin might actually be appeasing to Trump's ego. Seems like a much easier way to control him than holding something over him tbh. Remember, for Putin, total control of Trump forever isn't necessary. Even if he jumps off Putin's dick right now, he's already achieved so much for Putin that it'll have been worth it for him.

Honestly, hitting the Kremlin may actually cause nuclear escalation. Putin's ego would not survive the hit. Zelenskyy probably realizes this too, he's not stupid.

Tesla had two advantages. Let's ignore the original Roadster here, nobody bought one anyway and it was not a ground-up design by them.

First off, they started with a "luxury" EV. Luxury cars have high margins and you can more easily fit the price of the big battery in there - and since the S was a pretty big car, you have space for a big battery. The other two mainstream EVs at the time were the tiny Nissan Leaf and the even tinier Mitsubishi I-Miev - you couldn't fit a big battery in a car that tiny, nor can you charge enough of a price to pay for a big battery.

Note here I said "luxury" because if you compare the Tesla model S to the similarly priced Mercedes-Benz S-Class or BMW 7 series... Yeah no, the quality isn't anywhere near good enough. But it was still in the same market segment and competed by being completely unique at the time, instead of competing through luxury.

Secondly, they had no ICE heritage. No existing cars to start with. It's a huge advantage because they could design the platform right away to have a large flat battery pack at the bottom, etc. Meanwhile, Mercedes started selling its' first serious EV attempt in 2019 and that still had a transmission tunnel because it was based on the GLC SUV (which itself was just a C-Class on stilts lol). It didn't have a drive shaft, so no need for a tunnel for it. Just a waste of space. The first dedicated EV platform came out in 2021 with the EQS sedan. BMW made the i3 in 2013, but it was tiny, ugly and needed to burn gasoline to extend range. Bleh. First proper EV? The i7, came out in 2022, STILL shares its platform with the ICEs. Audi? First proper EV was the OG E-Tron SUV (now called the Q8 E-Tron, unrelated to the actual Q8) in 2019, shares platform with ICEs, but it was among the first earliest EVs to have a proper heat pump system to keep you warm without draining the battery straight to zero in the winter. Range? Bad. Overall quality? Meh. Performance was decent and it at least feels like a proper car though. Suspension was superb. Felt like a small light car driving it. For a 2.5 ton SUV that's a compliment. But worst of all? It's being discontinued, and the downmarket EVs (Q4 E-tron) from Audi are way worse. So of the big 3 Germans, Mercedes is the ONLY one to use a dedicated EV architecture for some of its vehicles.

Look, I'm a huge fan of German cars. Love-hate relationship with Audi, love relationship with BMW and Mercedes. Starting with the Passat B6, I pretend Volkswagen doesn't exist. But they fumbled it all HARD and they would've had the absolute best chance to be Tesla killers. They know how to make big expensive luxury cars. Could've launched proper luxury EVs a decade ago and Tesla would be a regional automaker for the US. But they didn't. Because of their arrogance and complacency. Fucking Jaguar of all companies even beat them to it.

But Tesla was popular before that. In 2012, Tesla was the only EV that didn't completely suck.

The house of Saud has a lot of money in renewables already for example. But they make even more money if we buy all their oil first, so that's what they want us to do.

Yeah, having fabs in the US as well as other countries could pay off yuuugely. If potential fab customers are truly afraid of Intel copying their designs - Intel could enter an agreement with say Qualcomm that it won't design any ARM CPUs for X years. Surely there's a market for US made SoCs once you can assemble the logic board of a smartphone in the US, and a smartphone from parts. You'd still import some parts but shift production to the US for what's possible - but you need to start with the end product and work your way down because otherwise you're shipping components back to China for final assembly. And the more expensive the components you can produce in the US, the less you're affected by tariffs.

Floorp is a nice one to use and deserves a mention.

Brrrrrrrrt

Yeah for a long time there Intel was way ahead of the fabless AMD. Back then people were saying it was a mistake for AMD to split the fab business.

I think some people just use them interchangeably (or more likely, call both pills and capsules, pills). At least in my language/country. Because in general it's an unimportant detail if both need to be swallowed.

Of course medical professionals would use the correct terms, I mean regular people in a conversation.

It's the 32 KG mop all over again

Note: Above video is marketing for an exercise plan, but it's also funny to watch occasionally when he has new episodes. As far as I know, the weights are real, but they're always loaded funny in the videos. Max plates visually for the weight the dudes are lifting