blivet

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Exactly. I can’t imagine a worse moment for a left-wing spoiler candidate to run. Our democracy itself is at stake. Fuck Cornel West, and fuck the Green Party.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One reason might be that they couldn’t even be bothered to say what the moment they enjoyed was.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes, the name of the company, the logo, and the idea of “tweets” are all a charming evocation of a world filled with brief messages. Twitter has problems, but branding isn’t one of them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I think we are in the midst of a worldwide epidemic of mental illness, and even the wealthiest and most powerful are not immune.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m just glad we have an adult at the helm and I don’t have to wake up the next morning to see what bat shit insane thing has just happened.

Exactly. For four years, practically every fucking day it was, “Oh God, what’s he done now?”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

if you are saying that Sontag is wrong to use "magma" as "foundation"... I would have to say on what basis you claim that?

A foundation is usually a stable structure, not a liquid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I like to think so, but a lot of intelligent people pick up on the meaning of words from context, and sometimes they get it wrong. I remember reading that Susan Sontag used the word “magma” as if it meant something like “foundation” or “basis”.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, I think it was Scorsese who said that he did “one for them, and one for me”.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, by the end of the story all the characters had been shown to be so awful that I didn’t care what happened to any of them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Same here. I feel the same way about a lot of New Wave SF from that era. I like J.G. Ballard because he’s such a strong writer that he can pull off that sort of plotless “experimental” stuff, but the rest of them don’t do it for me. Why would I want to read an SF writer trying to write like William S. Burroughs when I can just read William S. Burroughs?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Like that ultra-cringe DeSantis ad from a couple of weeks ago.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, I figured that she was saying the things she does because it riles up her base, but this last bit has made me decide that she’s genuinely stupid. If she had any sense at all she would have noticed that the phrasing of her remarks could sound like praise, and would have changed it to something unambiguously critical.

view more: ‹ prev next ›