automattable

I always thought this was super on purpose. Is it not intentional design for “child protection?”

They probably don’t have to worry about out title ix for too much longer…

Dammit, lol. Autocorrect got me and I didn’t notice.

Occam’s Razor is that the simplest answer is probably right.

You’re thinking of Hanson’s razor which states:

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Is there an OLED tv on the market now that doesn’t just exist to sell ads?

110% right. What a stupid article.

No matter how clear your law is, if SCOTUS doesn’t like it, they can just declare it unconstitutional after the first yahoo with standing sues the government.

How do you propose they parent other people’s kids?

But if you make another hole upstream, how do you allow that to heal? It’d be extra holes all the way ~~down~~ up.

If Ukraine actually did assassinate Tucker, I’d only support them more.

Also would have accepted the rare double contraction “shouldn’t’ve.”

Since when do GOP senators care about what’s “moral?”