What? I agree with function[T]
style generics, and would be willing to change the access syntax to something like container.[index]
, as the dot makes the difference quite clear.
Or do you mean the approach to implementing a container or the way the compiler has to transform it into the set operation/mutable access? I didn't think that was such a problem, and I quite like the way it is done in rust, but that approach may be unavailable to many languages.
anton
What's a struct, but a tuple with some names?
What's computation but state and a transition function between states?
What's computation but a set of functions transformed by simple term rewriting?
Let people enjoy their syntax sugar.
Once a year Berlin holds a massive bike demonstration/event where we take over many streets, including the autobahn, and converge on the center. Sadly I either hear about it to late or don't have time that day. :(
I don't get the appeal of parades focused watching rows of decorated vehicles from the sidelines compared to marches where everyone just walks as a crowd, with just enough loudspeaker vehicles to provide music, speeches and coordination.
It's a bit of a change but certainly the right thing to do.
My only disagreement with the article is the get/set stuff. I still want to keep something like the old container[index]
syntax, maybe container.[index]
to indicate that it's a form of access. As long as generics go after names, this would not cause ambiguity.
Once america was in, the allies were going to win eventually. The breaking of nazi encryption only reduced the length by *checks notes* two to three years (excluding the atomic bombs, but thats a topic for another day).
No, the mirror reflects to the view finder untill you press the shutter, then it moves thr mirror to expose the photo sensor and then back.
Ich habs so gelesen.
If it's a moving mirror camera* and it's used to take stills it's probably fine, as the sensor is only exposed for a fraction of a second per image.
If you want to film with it or put it in a phone, where it's exposed all the time, it would certainly not be enough.
* I have no clue what they are called in english
Not In My Back Yard
It refers to people generally supportive of things, but not where they live.
Typical topics are energy/transport infrastructure or housing for refugees/homeless people.
At least be fair and cut out the .into()
There needs to be a clear legal standard, and 18 Years is the arbitrary line we agreed on.
When a 17 Year old go to war, they are child soldiers, and when they get bombed/starve, they count towards the children death toll.