androogee
๐คจ
It's the primary source. It's original investigative journalism, not a Wikipedia article or a listicle. Link to what? Itself?
Just pretend like the anti-consumer and anti-creator criticisms aren't there. They can't hurt you if you just don't acknowledge that they exist.
I've heard that some versions of the Blockchain are not based on computing power and therefore are not nearly as awful re: emissions. But I don't really know much about it so I decided to look into Odysee.
Instead I found out all about how the company that created the protocol was blasted out of existence by the SEC for selling unregistered securities & the website is full of Nazis because they don't do anything about fucking Nazis.
Never did reach a conclusion about the blockchain thing. Kinda stopped caring. Sounds like a clusterfuck.
To be fair, the supreme court has also gotten in the habit of making decisions based on outcomes rather than principles
The swedish chef falling off a cliff
I said ooh girl! // I'm dancing like an electric fool // Baby girl // Turn me on with your electric rool
Oh I'm aware of the source. And I repeat: Fuck this shit. It's stupid and self destructive and needs to be left in the past, not mindlessly repeated.
Ahhh yes, mind obliterating cynicism with no wisdom or practical solutions, just the bliss of never having to admit your own civic responsibility to do anything.
Fuck this shit.
I'm so tired of hearing this argument.
Of course there's a better way this could be resolved, no matter how much you try to pretend otherwise.
A cop could shoot both of them and their dogs. And that's peak freedom. Maybe think about that next time.
Waluigi