What did you do to the poor thing? Looks like you've been stabbing it with a fork 24/7 for years. Toss it, and be (a lot) more careful with the next one - or skip nonstick entirely. They already have a finite lifetime when not abused, and if you manage to ruin the coat in one spot that's a hotspot for "scaling off" more.
Stainless steel can take a beating, though, go nuts.
More of this shit?? (Sorry, "questions")
Come on, dude. It is pitifully transparent already, and then when you consistently try to argue with every reply you out yourself as completely dishonest or completely clueless.
OP needs some meds
Course it is, GPT made it.
What are you, fuckin' chicken?
Must've absolutely made the writer's day.
Sticking with an old engine can also lose you a lot of time. Particularly, I suspect, when it's this one. Same piece of shit with the same limitations and issues as every Bethesda game, saddled with massive technical debt from the first instant. This thing was made with sword-and-horse CRPGs in mind - not at a huge scale, either - and works sorta OK-ish for Fallout... and now they wanted to tack on space flight, too.
The metro in one of the Fallout 3 expansions was famously basically... a hat, on an NPC. That's the sort of stuff you can end up doing if trying to do new/unsupported shit in old engines - and this is not getting any younger. Working out bugs, missing features, odd edge cases, old hacks that "just fixed something real quick" 15 years ago, trying to dig up old documentation...
Time adds up fast, those sunk costs are gonna fuck you up. And then you end up releasing Starfield.
Still don't know exactly how that translates into "we could only make one interior and copy-pasted it a hundred times" though.
tfw you get caught flipping a grunt
Definitely a "change some words around" from Miyamoto, whom this is usually attributed to.
The article says it's failed to differentiate from placebo.
Call me a cynic, but I'd not really take health advice from them, let alone on something they want to sell people.