It's considered a formal fallacy. That doesn't mean it's necessarily a bad point in context, it just isn't the point it's often presented as. If someone is making a long speech about how X is bad, when they do it themselves all the time, then you're probably right to discount their arguments - if they're not stupid, they're dishonest. But pointing out the hypocrisy is technically "off topic" if you're arguing whether X is actually bad.
amio
joined 2 years ago
It really depends, is the word important in the sentence? Can you do it without losing focus, or will it screw you up so you have to re-read parts of it? Can you make a decently "safe" guess at the meaning?
For my part, I mostly stop and look things up.
So not only does he want to replace a perfectly cromulent word that everyone uses and whose meaning most people agree on...
... his suggested replacement is "Unlocking World". Yes, I sure do love that Unlocking World genre...
Reducing mental load on the developer helps a lot. There’s no way you can say c is simpler than higher level languages.
Sure, and... that's why I didn't say that, I guess? I live firmly in VM/script land - C# when I can, actually. Reducing developer load is fine by me and I don't have a particular obsession with optimizing for performance - most things I do are not that exciting.
My point is that there's a difference between layers of abstraction that serve an actual purpose (loops, classes, garbage collection), and weird stuff that grows out of "innovation" that maybe wasn't all that good an idea, but was tacked on something else for novelty or cargo cult reasons, or the wrong kind of laziness. The idea of being able to only target web is fine. The idea of occasionally shipping a browser with a particular app could be merited. I'm just saying maybe not half of every app needed to be bundled with a whole chromium installation.
Why do computers become more and more powerful, but programs continue to lag?
Because instead of taking advantage of hardware to push boundaries in what we can accomplish, it's exploited so you can turn everything into its own instance of Chromium, with all the bloat and overhead that entails, for the world's simplest application. Even on mobile, where power consumption is allegedly important.
The industry spends so much time reinventing wheels and shoehorning things into each other, instead of doing anything... useful. Can't have a normal web page anymore because waaaah page loads, gotta be SPA, then you gotta reinvent all the stuff that you threw out to make an SPA - probably in the form of several dozen libraries, all of which also keep getting reinvented every other week. What's that, the SPA is now a 4GB download and seven orders of magnitude slower than the page loads it was supposedly meant to avoid? Lol who cares. Put some more layers of transpiled javascript in there anyway. Keeping up with the NPM dependencies alone is now 40% of the manpower in the corporation? Don't worry, it's modular or some shit.
It's not even about the money, none of this helps generate actual value - in theory, being able to just target web makes sense, but not if relentlessly overcomplicated at every turn anyway. If the money/management people could tear themselves away from being phished for five minutes, and actually understood how much time and effort is being wasted on building mostly redundant card houses of mostly unnecessary tech, they'd have a stroke.
Amen to that. It takes quite a bit of work to try to curate away all the communities that are explicitly political, and then you need to deal with thinly veiled political soapboxing in AskWhatever, NoStupidQuestions, meme communities, etc too - despite there being communities specifically for political content.
Some of us just want to have a silly laugh without being confronted with the lightspeed decline of humanity every five minutes. Fuck us, right?
Diffusion of responsibility, nobody wanting it enough to force the issue or shepherd it through committing to it/planning it/developing it, and/or not knowing if the considerable amount of effort will "pay off" in the sense of actually getting merged.
Note that I have no clue about Minetest specifically, I'm just guessing
This strikes me as a bit... situational.
Um, ackchually, I think you'll find they're libre, not free.
(Just kidding)
Optical disks have physically stamped "holes" to denote data. There's no way just reading it would be able to change anything.
They don't. Having your native language be easier than another doesn't mean you're struggling significantly.
You can't, because to a certain degree that is exactly what existence is. Light, sound, touch etc. are all experiences the brain creates, and we assume those come from interacting with our physical surroundings. That's a fairly decent assumption, but if it's wrong, we'd have no way of knowing.