No. Rabies is destroying neurons, causing the symptoms. The hydrophobia is not literal fear of water (like phobias so often aren't) but a result of your brain being fried to the point where you have issues swallowing. If it were an issue of hydration, just IV fluids would be a given, and you would probably want IV access anyway.
Not a doctor or anything, though.
I use Facebook pretty indirectly, mostly Messenger and the odd birthday or event. Calling it enjoyment is pushing it pretty far, though.
dae le joxicity xD xD xD eggs dee
Ok.
Still no, though.
Because if you don't keep a close eye on mental patients, some of them might hurt or kill themselves or other people - sometimes in extraordinarily resourceful and unexpected ways. It's rare and overhyped, but the fact that it does happen means the system needs to account for it. Then add the usual amount of greed, incompetence, stigma etc., and suddenly the only way of accounting for that is, well, prison style.
Surprised they didn't go for "When I win this, it isn't just for I, it's for all of I"
Versioning. "This version of SharedComponent has this and that functionality" and "this version of OtherComponent requires this specific version of SharedComponent".
If you're getting stuck with significant "this has to come with for that to go" problems - that aren't literal dependencies, but arise from code wonk or poor separation of concerns - you may have some "architecture smell" that could be addressed. Obvious "usual suspects" include things (whether at a single class, component, or entire service level) that have too many responsibilities/purposes/reasons to change, and mismanaged abstraction.
Feels like no matter what the system is, no matter how simple (single upvote) or complicated it is (lvx's different votes and weights-per-community-per-user idea from elsewhere ITT - cool but not terribly practical-seeming), people are just gonna faceroll it at best, spam/abuse it as a general rule.
Possibly, maybe a tiny amount of people will even use it as intended.
Even Reddit's system (quality/irrelevant) works in theory but nobody actually uses it that way, so it's agree/disagree-or-just-fuck-you instead. You will not be able to educate users on the simplest shit ever ("upvote for quality"), let alone if there's e.g. six different votes with different nuances. Even if you did make sure everyone knew the intended way, you would not defeat the general "fuck that lol, I do what I want" attitude. Even if you did that, it would only last until some guy sees something he disagrees with, and that's a trillion times per second on the internet.
But with that in mind:
So, Facebook.
I doubt there'd be a Wilson. Making some basic shelter would be a priority. I would also probably start looking for an out pretty quick.
(OP originally asked for a way to cheat on an exam citing "personal reasons")