amenji

joined 1 year ago
[–] amenji@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A lot of people already suggests several databases or plaintexts like json.

But to be honest if the dataset is not too big and doesn't grow (since it is historical anyway), why not just use markdown with Hugo (a static site generator). You could also make use of its supported search tools to search texts in the stories.

As a bonus, since it's a static website, you can host it and share it to the world!

[–] amenji@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

Well, with that domain name I can't really hide it.

To your point, think about it this way: AI, at this stage, still need someone to tell then what to do. Whether you're good programmer or a bad programmer, AI still need you. Not until we get ASI, anyway.

I hope this makes you feel better?

 

Creativity is either exploited by AI or capitalized for growth. It just depends on the game you play, and how you play it.

How does AI influence our creativity in our work?

The answer is that it depends.

In this post, I explore that question through the lens of chess vs. programming and how AI thrives in clarity but struggles in ambiguity.

Let me know what you think!

(Note: This is a link to my own blog)

[–] amenji@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

It's as if Toyota and Samsung are adjectives just as the word "dangerous" and "mortal" can be used as an adjective.

The image of asian women in their traditional clothing hints of them gossiping. They are probably talking about some event and one of them comment "Toyota, Samsung, even" to remark the positive/negative significance of the event.

[–] amenji@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This isn't really about winning or losing (defined by what, exactly? Upvotes? Lol)

It's good argument on differing ideas.

And I only mentioned price caps because you mentioned capping houses owned. Not my intention to strawman you.

[–] amenji@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

You're saying there's plenty of homes as if they are natural resources to be distributed. They aren't. Someone who spends money to build the homes and covers the costs necessary to even start building the homes need to get their return.

Even if they are natural resources to be distributed and enough houses already exists, what are you proposing? Just give the homes away?

You're paying a house and now its worth is more than double the amount you paid 17 years. Sorry, you're an idiot if you think there's a "correct" price of anything. That's the point of prices in market economy. They rise and fall depends on countless economic circumstances. I don't think your old house lives in a vacuum not affected by the economic changes surrounding your town/city or neighborhood.

If you're thinking about housing price cap, let's even stop this discussion because clearly you are not familiar about macroeconomic causes and effects.

[–] amenji@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago

What if it's yellow? That's what I want to find out.

[–] amenji@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ideal reality: Google doesn't buy advantage from browsers to make their search engine the default. This way, other search engines can compete at the same level, right?

Reality: browser developers will have their income cut down because now their main source of income is dead (see recent news on Mozilla).

Usually these kinds of policies that may or may not come up out of goodwill results in unintended consequences that negatively affect others.

The winner here are the politicians.

[–] amenji@programming.dev -5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm with you on this.

In this thread are people who screams monopoly, thinking they know what it means. One comment said Google is a monopoly, followed by "along with "

They're giants because they're successful and good at what they do. They're successful because people are benefiting and find values from the products they use. The moment these giants stops "exploiting" people will be when they stop bringing values to society.

They've confused economic reality with their own ideal reality.

[–] amenji@programming.dev 35 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Maybe that isn't a problem

[–] amenji@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago (6 children)
 

Taken on S22 Ultra.

 

This obviously isn't something new that shows up overnight. We already had dating sims and the likes. But with generative AIs, the catch is that of scale and of personalization: not only it is easier to make thousands of virtual partners at a time, each individual virtual partners can be personalized to our liking.

Not even Huxley could have predicted this lol.

view more: next ›