amanneedsamaid

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The cli fulfills everything I need, but a desktop GUI would be nice too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Silence! (The app name, not you.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

No problem! About the USB drive, running it in a VM would not tell you anything about how it will run on the Macbook itself. I would recommend booting into the usb in a 'live environment'. Essentially, you boot into the linux operating system off of the usb and are able to play around and use it in a non-persistent environment. You simply plug in the usb and select it as your boot device. If you decide you like it and it works well, installing should be as easy and following the steps in the installer. The reason running a VM wouldn't tell you anything is that VMs are virtualizated, meaning they don't directly run off of your computers hardware. The drivers used for virtual machines are their own unique virtualization drivers, so for these reasons running linux VMs is separate from linux compatibility on bare metal.

Here is an explanation of those questions:

  1. This is less important when choosing your first distro, but some users have varying preferences on package managers. The package manager is responsible for installing and updating everything on your system (everything; applications, libraries, and the kernel) that has been installed via the package manager. Some package managers are distro-agnostic and are installed alongside your distro's package manager, like Nix or Guix, although you don't really have to worry about these. The package manager is baked into the distro you used and cannot be changed, and some distros have the same package manager. For an example of a preference, dnf (Fedora's package manager) commands are much more verbose than pacman (Arch's package manager) commands.

To show what I mean, here's the command for installing a package with each:

dnf install

pacman -S

Some find the letter arguments of pacman more confusing.

An example of a preference I've observed is that I prefer dnf's search results over apt's (Debian's package manager), although apt search is much faster than dnf's. Little things like these don't make a huge difference, but the package manager is something you will interact with a lot, so watching a quick video or guide on a distro's package manager can't hurt.

  1. A display server is responsible for displaying your graphical environment. If you have your laptop open and you're looking at a few windows, the display server is responsible for the placement, size, and content of the windows. Everything graphic on a linux system is handled by the display server. You have chosen to get into linux in the middle of a sort of transition period from the older X11 display server to the newer Wayland display server. Wayland is newer, more secure, and overall snappier / less screen-tear-ey. X11 is older and not receiving development, but is tried and tested, much better for accessibility needs than Wayland, and more "self-contained" (i.e X11 is not just one program, it contains many programs to make interacting with the graphic environment easy and consistent. Wayland leaves these integrations in the hand of each "compositor")

Desktop environments and window managers will either:

  1. Support Wayland and X11
  2. Support only X11 (Many X11 only examples have forks that support Wayland)
  3. Support only Wayland

As for your applications, some may or may not support running on Wayland natively, which is a non-issue as the program XWayland will automatically run X11 only programs through X11 on your Wayland desktop.

TL;DR on the display server section here: One day you will have to use Wayland, but today is not that day. If Wayland covers all the functionality you need, and you do not use NVIDIA (Wayland on NVIDIA is not in a good state currently), I would go with that. If accessibility or easy software compatibility is your aim, go X11.

  1. This one is easy, let's say you've decided you 100% want to use the Cinnamon desktop environment. Linux Mint has three spins (All that 'spin' means is a version of the distro with that desktop environment pre-installed): Cinnamon, MATE, and XFCE, however not all distros offer a Cinnamon spin. If you wanted to use a distro that does not offer a spin of the desktop environment you'd like, download the 'minimal' iso for that distro. Some distros call this iso a different name or might only offer a 'server' iso that fulfills the same purpose, but basically you'll boot into a tty (terminal prompt) and you can simply install the desktop environment you want via the package manager.

I hope this helps and isn't confusing!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

That website is awesome! Exactly what I was looking for, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Random question as Im very interested in using XMPP: Are public homeservers fine as long as you enable encryptions? And is there a list of recommended homeservers?

Im aware you can self host, that just is not an option for me currently

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Especially for your first time, I would recommend you have someone with you. If you decide to do it alone, start with a very small dose to get familiar with the euphoria, and then maybe a few days later try a higher dose.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

For under $300, I would go for a used Thinkpad. I got a T460s for a few hundred bucks that runs linux wonderfully (jesus was the pre-installed Windows slow though). Linux usually runs much better than Windows on old low-end hardware. That 2015 MacBook has an Intel processor, so I would try Linux on that first as it might be more powerful than what you can afford to buy.

Kali is not an OS you would want to use for your main desktop, if you need those security tools you can run them in a virtual machine / live usb. I see you've tried to base your distro choice off of what you intend to do in school, which I think is a mistake. Choose your distro based off of the merits of the distro itself, as once you get past the package manager and release cycle, you can get the same experience on any distribution.

Before choosing a distro I would make sure you know the answer to these questions (in terms of what you want):

  1. Stable or rolling release model?
  2. Package manager (apt, dnf, pacman, zypper, etc.)

and these about your desktop environment:

  1. What desktop environment (or standalone window manager) do you want to use?
  2. Do I want to use Wayland or X11 as a display server? Does it matter to me which I use?
  3. Does your distro have a spin preinstalled with your desktop environment of choice?

^ Also, if you are unsure about what some of this means, feel free to ask.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I know Silence has an option for STIR verification (which I'm not very familiar with). I think government numbers and such can get through, but I'm not certain. Your solution is great for making sure people can still get through!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I think the line is drawn when a machine is doing the processing. I disagree that the brain of the AI doesn't really contain the art, as even though this might be literally true, there have been instances of AI generating images that are extremely similar to source images from its dataset (given the right prompt).

I think that any art AI creates is a form of plagiarism, as the only reason it can create anything at all is because it has deduced patterns from its dataset of existing art. Without that other art, it literally could not create anything. In regards to an AI creating a new style of art, I don't think that will ever happen without sentient intelligence. AI doesn't have creativity, anything it creates is a combination of data on other art pieces. Also, I think that if the AI's deduction was observed and compared with it's prompt, you absolutely could find out exactly what the inspiration was for its new art.

Now if an AI achieved true sentient intelligence, perhaps at a certain scale it would overcome these issues and be able to create original art. I think the human brain is a mysterious art generator that is much more complex than a large language model finding patterns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I hadn't looked in a while, but I guarantee they used to have the prem scores on there, thats a shame.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I guess, but thats kind of misleading. AI literally studying and storing the data of billions of pieces of art to find patterns is not equivalent to a human creating art after a lifetime of seeing or being inspired by art.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this the program where they only allow repair shops to stock parts 1:1 with placed orders? If so, completely useless.

view more: ‹ prev next ›