You have to be trolling at this point, he alley-ooped it and you dunked the on yourself ๐
amanneedsamaid
joined 2 years ago
Fr ๐ does he think his friend is going to sexually assault him? His mindset proves he has a huge lack of respect for his friend.
Wow. Thats an insane thing to say.
Yeah, laws already cover all the bases. Thats why I think the entire idea of not letting trans people use their bathroom of choice is derogatory.
Isn't this just an argument against your point of view? Most people I've ever talked to don't care as long as the trans individual is minding their own business, why should the majority conform to a very small minority who is uncomfortable? Your argument is the same one made to support segregated bathrooms.
A reason to support something can also be a reason it is passed. The main reason this happened was what the judge said. Another reason this happened is because people believe there are inherent issues with hiring agency workers to break strikes. All ideas in general have an effect on legislation.
You are being hyper-literal.
I don't either, honestly.
Its another reason one would support the action of removing / opposing the law. Another reason (and the more legally important one as I accounted for before) would be the fact that the unions would not be consulted.
Wow, I think the same thing about you!
Correct, not the reasoning the judge used. The reasoning behind not allowing employers to break strikes with agency workers. (Outside of the fact they didn't consult the unions when deciding before)
Nope, just the reasoning behind it from the article.
Because trans people are not a third, distinct gender. They are male or female.