Antiwork Mod Situation 2: Electric Boogaloo
Left Russia several years ago because i didn't want to support the aggressive war in Ukraine.
How is it going after relocating?
The most brazen example is Squad 22: ZOV, released on Steam in May 2025 and openly endorsed by Russia’s Defense Ministry.
Now as I checked it's page, I'm pretty sure to assume it's more of a grift, or only a grift, and probably only internal, but wtf it's on Steam? I thought Valve has at least some policies. And while they slack on any moderation, they only have so much products and did some formal review before accepting it on their platform and saw no problem? I'm out of words.
And existing measures are not on Steam, but payment processors. Valve got free rep doing nothing.
On the other hand I imagine profits and playerbase are not why they are still there, but their previous decision to wire up the whole region via russian servers and general refusal to moderate anything at all keeping the company as small as possible.
My reading speed seriosly lags behind my decision making timeeeeeeeeeeeeees
You're going to have to measure and evaluate something. In my experience, corporations loves measuring all the wrong things. They can usually barely even define what "performance" means, never mind measure it correctly.
I'm wondering if there is even the right way to do that in most trades, and moreso a uniformal way to do it across several activities. Maybe the whole conversation is misleading and inescapably drive you off the path, because the problem itself is erroneously set. Like this blurry line when you start to care about genetics that much it start to smell like eugenics. Measuring people's worth in money does leave this bitter taste, and under capitalism you are supposed to do so to get by, if not as a boss, but as a worker estimating own value convertable into quality of life. It wasn't always the case, and probably, the bright future is when we will abandon this concept and would freely replicate food from reusable and abundant energy traversing space and searching for it's many wonders.
In spite of questionable but regularly cited source Finding Nemo (2003), I find it's faulty to assume we can predict what a seagul can say if it can talk in our language whithout having any reference material in reality. But if I may have some horses in this race, and I don't, I believe they (a) wan't blame humans for what we did to their wellbeing for it's not an obvious enough connection to make judging by their limited perspective, but (b) they'd sure vocally reflect on modern problems they encounter, like having infrequent and decreasing game in the waters, calling us stupid big featherless fucks not worthy shitting on either way because it is simple enough to conclude that this and our overwhelming presence in their ecosystem are somehow connected.
I can see a counter-argument that it would create an incencitive to spend more time where it could be cut down and, also, wiring worker's paychecks to a sometimes arbitrary and flowing value. Like, you don't need to clean the outdoors property every day, it depends on the weather, and there I can see paying a stable wage reserving person's time and paying for it in case I need to call them even if it's sunny and they don't actually need to go. As long as they do their job well, who cares. They or a company can reinvest in better tools making their actual worktime even shorter or more comfortable, like, jumping from a manual gardening tools to an automated lawnmower, while not punishing them for working less. Some kinds of labor doesn't even necessitate being on site, as it was shown by covid, and we see a lot of ideas to cut down on wages due to LLM assistance.
I'm also puzzled about how uneven my work from day to day, and I'd probably prefer to give up on measuring and comparing that at all, defaulting to some lively wage and pulling enough of myself to keep the business afloat. If the idea of a guy over us is in having similar stakes in the business and collectively voting for changes, I see it's possible to set a fair compensation and keep people interested in the end results.
I'd be pretty surprised if their perspective could be anyhow relevant to us, besides climate change, oil spillings and rise and fall of fishing, shipment businesses. A talking seagull would probably look at everything we say like we are some cryptobro 4channers obsessing over deeply unserious and niche stuff. Catherine tornado murdering the coast? Yeah, now we talk business. The fall of the market in 2008? That's some fake inlanders' shit I can't care about.
They are Super SUS, a trash videoblogger discovering abandoned industrial locations with half of their thing being in their unfortunate appearance, half in doing stupid and dangerous stuff for views, and I'm pretty comfortable with them not getting more traction. I watched a couple of their collabs with other youtubers, one being with him swimming in, allegedly, irradiated water in Chornobyl, and it gave off some hate-based freak circus vibes.
Potatoes: Become poisonous from a touch of sunlight because they would be too plain and basic veggies without having a fucking defensive mechanism against their discovery on the surface
If only of a RTO speedrunner type.