alabasterhotdog

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Perhaps your question would be better posed to the BBC.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is likely the vapidest thing I'll see all week. Conspiratorial garbage.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

I have to see any evidence that you weren't in fact born yesterday.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You posted a pointlessly cynical take, and are now upset that someone pointed that out?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Trudeau: India, please help me get the spotlight off of domestic issues, like seriously please.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

While you gotta start "somewhere", this is as close to "nowhere" as a govt could possibly go.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Conversely, he could do (well, did) essentially nothing for a few years while the housing and affordability crisis intensifies and somehow there'd still be a Greek chorus of red party kool-aid drinkers telling non-partisan Canadians that he's the second coming of Christ.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

That we'll likely end up with some type of Conservative govt simply because Liberals refuse to upset one sliver of their supporters, namely landlords and speculators, is pretty fucking insane.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fuck winning, fuck campaigning, how about they simply govern? That'd be a nice change, that we're still on the "we're still mulling it over" stage with respect to housing is borderline negligent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

What an awful, awful source. Do better, OP.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Almost like most folk can identify an agenda-poster when they see one, huh OP?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

I genuinely can't tell if you are talking about about Poilievre or Trudeau.

view more: ‹ prev next ›