alabasterhotdog

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (11 children)

That NDP party leadership isn't already planning a campaign with cost of living issues as the focus unfortunately sums up today's NDP: looking for headlines instead of votes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're not scared, they're likely here to read news posts, not some simpleton confusing this platform with twitter. If you wanted to masturbate your politics there's plenty of venues that are appropriate for that, this forum isn't it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Any rational person can clearly see you're pushing an agenda here and not arguing in good faith.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Clearly education isn't your priority, as you proudly make clear you don't have much of one. To turn it slightly uncivil, go be 14 years old elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wasn't being uncivil, nor was that my intent, just clearly suggesting that if you don't know much about a topic, perhaps having some self-restraint and not commenting would be a better course for all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (8 children)

My biggest socialedia pet peeve: why is it that those who know the least of a topic are the first to comment on it?

To add context to the answer below, its significant as she was one of the few Repubs who publicly blamed Trump for Jan 6, but she's been tacking hard right as of late.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thank you, bot, for the daily knife through my heart.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You're so, so close to self-reflection but alas.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

"I'm comfortable, surely everyone else is then."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If something that's posted twice is a duplicate, what does one call something that's been posted at least a dozen times already today?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Rational people who recognize low-quality information.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

This simply isn't true.

view more: ‹ prev next ›