alabasterhotdog

You might want to continue to learn about the issue, as your comment is not exactly an even analysis. It seems more like a narrative wrapped up in surface-level analysis.

Got lucky with 0:36. Usually don't try for a fast time but did so today.

Can't wait for them to re-announce their previous paltry announcements.

I hear ya, the democracy part might be a lil hyperbolic but even if we get to the funding deadline next month, there will be plenty of ripples felt. I do think they will eventually settle on Donalds (the rep, not orange Donald) or someone close to the freedom caucus but whoever they settle on will have the same issues as McCarthy.

That...makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I do see the overarching point you're trying to make but your suggestion is not how this will play out.

Honestly, I'd consider it more likely you need medication and some time offline but hey you do you, friend.

Outside of the cynical bluster of all your comments in this post, you've certainly convinced me of that assumption.

Oddly, I'd trust someone closer to senility more than someone who can't even spell it.

I mean, I'm more familiar with the 30 years of evolving values since the show aired.

We'll simply have to agree to disagree on that, as I see shaming anyone for being gay as a pretty shitty thing to do, regardless of context.

Funny, as the subtext of your comment suggests, grossly, that there is something wrong with that.

You're being quite generous to call that "logic."