agitatedpotato

joined 2 years ago
[–] agitatedpotato 46 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What disgusting people those 'settelers' are.

[–] agitatedpotato 17 points 2 years ago

How that seperation of church and state going son?

[–] agitatedpotato 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The federal Constitution prevents any state from recalling a member of congress, so your federal reps can not be recalled legally. They would have to be expelled from within the congress, you get to vote and thats it.

[–] agitatedpotato 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah and whos gonna stop him? It's not like he was doing something as horrible as condeming the Israelie slaughter of innocents, then maybe we could do something like hold a vote on how much we don't like him.

[–] agitatedpotato 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I dont believe voting does much, but I know refusing to vote doesn't do anything, I don't see why I wouldn't show up.

[–] agitatedpotato 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Not just GM, if you tried ro question the safety of these cars on even Lemmy before these revelations came out you would get brigaded by people claiming they were safer than humans statistically and thats all they needed to be in order to be acceptable.

[–] agitatedpotato 10 points 2 years ago

Not a 'new' American Dream, just one of the extremely few American Dreams left.

[–] agitatedpotato 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

So how much genocide in your opinion is okay to vote for under the suspicion that someone else might also do a genocide?

Because either you're admitting theres no way to vote ourselves out of genocide or that joes genocides is okay because someone else MAY also preside over genocide. Thats a new one, this genocide is acceptable because if it wasn't this, it would just be another genocide, do I have that right?

Im of the opinion that I cannot materially support genocide. Call it single issue voterism if you want but to me never again means never again, not never again unless maybe the someone else would also finance genocide. Having boundaries is healthy and just, and if genocide is only a soft boundary for someone then I place no value in what they have to say.

[–] agitatedpotato 2 points 2 years ago

"Hello yes I'm your insurance agent, now before I read this decision to you, are you now or were you ever a lawyer? No? Okay denied get fucked L + ratio."

[–] agitatedpotato 2 points 2 years ago

Republicans could call all jews the k word but as long as they still support Israel, they'd be fine, and probably get aipac donations for it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›