So who is the new president? I’m hoping it’s someone with strong liberal roots.
adespoton
joined 2 years ago
Public lands are valued by conservatives for recreation and food, even though they’re lands held in common — ie: socialist.
I’ll second the SQL database here. Especially since most people who use a spreadsheet actually treat it as a database in the first place, and not as a way to lay out data in a 2D table.
But if a hierarchical table is really what’s desired, any visual database interface should do the trick.
Love the socialism but hate the socialist.
They’re calling out the hypocrisy of “conservatives” who depend on and appreciate social policies but then label anything they don’t like as evil socialism.
American freedom of ignorance at its finest.
I hate to be the one to point it out to Trump, but a significant number of famous cards living in the US are actually Canadian. And if he deports them… well, then he won’t have them all, will he?
Fandom.com?
In most situations I’d think you meant “boost his ego” but in this case, I think “boast” is more accurate.
They’ll likely deport him eventually.
Pew’s latest study suggests that Trump would have won even if they all voted.
Mostly because the majority of Americans seem to be OK with face eating leopards.
It’s a shame the US no longer meets international medical standards.
Exactly. People see “AI” and think LLMs and diffusion models. Those are both probabilistic translation engines. They’re no more intelligent than an AC/DC converter, just a lot more complex.
However, there are neural networks and sense arrays in the field of AI, and those are designed to replicate the process of thought.
The real route to a thinking AI is likely a combination of the two, where a neural network can call on expert systems including translation engines to do the heavy lifting and then run a more nuanced decision tree over the results.
Thing is, modern LLMs and diffusion models are already more complex than a single human mind can fully comprehend, so we default to internally labelling them as either “like us” or “magic”, even when we theoretically know them to be nothing but really deep predictive models.