aaaa

Maybe I'm misunderstanding how grooming techniques work, but nothing about that chest looks waxed to me at all. It looks drawn on, heavily airbrushed, and it's all out of proportion.

And the hairy chest looks far more attractive

How many bloods should a healthy man have?

This wasn't even the first John Redcorn they've lost. Seems like there's been tragedy through the show's entire run

There are lots of vehicles in this book. I grew up on this book (Hello, Goldbug!)

A woodchuck is not a vehicle. It's not a car or truck (even if she is a thing that goes). I will die on this hill.

But the paper said you shouldn't

These days, it's Alan Tudyk for me. For movies and tv shows.

He has been in some of the most bizarre and ridiculous concepts, but he still always makes them a delight to watch, even as a supporting character.

I haven't been disappointed yet, even if it's bound to happen eventually.

Eh, giving out a downvote isn't a stressor, nor it's it necessarily personal. It's not even an indicator that the content should be removed, just that a user doesn't think it's helpful/fun/or contributing to the discussion

It's bare minimum feedback where blocking is not. And honestly, we should encourage more of it, rather than encourage people to create their echo chambers (within an already somewhat echo chambery platform)

If anything is personally stressful, it's stressing over an anonymous user's opinion that has very little context to it. Downvotes don't even hide or reduce visibility of your comments or posts in most of the sorting methods.

Do people tell it their name a lot? Even when asking for help with something personalized (like a resume) I still tend to react my name and edit it in myself after.

... Is this just me?

This is already a thing that happens currently. Some admins/moderators don't like being downvoted and ban people for "vote manipulation" because they vote on things in their feed.

It is leading to exactly that, where people are worried that using the voting system as intended will lead to exclusion from participation in some communities.

If you can set up a jury of their peers to convict them, then you're on the right track.

The main moral argument against it would be lack of due process. While that should involve the courts, morally or ethically it probably doesn't have to.

Anya could talk to me about anything and I would listen

Lottery. Maybe this is just very US of me, or maybe it's just my form of autism/ADHD. But I have no faith in true love. There's a lot of happiness it can provide, but money provides more

Or at least more protection from unhappiness