ZDL

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 29 minutes ago

I really do wish I hadn't decided to boycott USAnal goods over two decades ago. I haven't got anything left to react with when I see these escalating atrocities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 37 minutes ago

U.S. Cops? Breaking the law with impunity? But that's unpossible!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

C'mon, Canada! We can bring that to 100%! Go team!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Depending on my mood anywhere from 3 to 7.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Their hallucinations have diminished to close to nothing.

Are you sure you're not an AI, 'cause you're hallucinating something fierce right here boy-o?

Actual research, as in not "random credulous techbrodude fanboi on the Internet" says exactly the opposite: that the most recent models hallucinate more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Huh. So there really is a 凤凰血. Weird how when I tried it (on several AIs) they just made shit up instead of giving me that information.

It's almost like how you ask the question determines how it answers instead of, you know, using objective reality. Almost as if it has no actual model of objective reality and is just a really sophisticated game of mad-libs.

Almost.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

There are, to my knowledge, two pictures of me on the Internet. Total. Both are at least two decades out of date. I haven't used my real name in any online context (I started with Fidonet) since the '80s. And while I do leak some information about my whereabouts, good luck finding me in a city that's bigger than the USA's top city (and is yet only about #10 in China…).

And why the secrecy?

Well, the time I got a phone call at 2AM from a guy in the USA who was absolutely dead-set on "domming" me in an online RPG game, wanting to take it RL kind of informed me I need to be super-careful about any identifiable information.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

He's telling the PRESIDENT OF SIGNAL what Signal is "really doing".

That's mansplaining, full-on.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Dude. Go be reply guy somehwere else. You bore the fuck out of me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

But not 100%. And the things they hallucinate can be very subtle. That's the problem.

If they are asked about a band that does not exist, to be useful they should be saying "I'm sorry, I know nothing about this". Instead they MAKE UP A BAND, ITS MEMBERSHIP, ITS DISCOGRAPHY, etc. etc. etc.

But sure, let's play your game.

All of the information on Infected Rain is out there, including their lyrics. So is all of the information on Jim Thirwell's various "Foetus" projects. Including lyrics.

Yet ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Claude will all three hallucinate tracks, or misattribute them, or hallucinate lyrics that don't exist to show parallels in the respective bands' musical themes.

So there's your objective facts, readily available, that LLMbeciles are still completely and utterly fucking useless for.

So they're useless if you ask about things that don't exist and will hallucinate them into existence on your screen.

And they're useless if you ask about things that do exist, hallucinating attributes that don't exist onto them.

They. Are. Fucking. Useless.

That people are looking at these things and saying "wow, this is so accurate" terrifies the living fuck out of me because it means I'm surrounded not by idiots, but by zombies. Literally thoughtless mobile creatures.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

That is BRILLIANT!

And so much for getting clues to what's happening from the locals! Or selling your loot!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

An obscure band with that name that has a discography that nobody's ever heard of anywhere, complete with band member names, track titles, etc?

Yeah, pull the other one, Sparky. It plays "Jingle Bells".

 

You don't want the answer, trust me.With an itheberg.

 

Text:

Panel 1 Man and woman in office clothes in a break room.

Man: So, if you were alone in a forest, would you rather run into a strange man… or a bear?

Panel 2 Woman: Oh, hmm… I think the bear.

Man (angry): How can you say that?

(Bear looking quizzically through the window)

Panel 3 Man (angry): You're demonizing men! It's misandry!

Panel 4 Woman: Good point. Why would I ever hear men's reactions?

Man: Exactly! …where did the honey go?

Panel 5 Woman and bear sharing tea

Woman: At least if you maul me, pepper won't say I made it up or I'm misinterpreting.

Bear: I hear you

 

I've found my Halloween getup (presuming I can get it in my size!):

A mannequin displays an elaborate gothic-inspired outfit set against a shimmering silver tinsel backdrop. The ensemble features a deep red, faux leather corset adorned with black spikes at chest level and silver grommets down the front, fastened at the bottom with metal clasps. The corset is paired with a matching ruched mini skirt made of a stretchy, semi-sheer mesh fabric, gathered with black eyelets and rings. Draped over the shoulders is a dramatic black satin and lace bolero with voluminous bell sleeves, trimmed with ruffled red chiffon. Accessories include a large silver rose pendant at the neck, layered black bead chains, a wide belt with a large metal O-ring, and an ankh charm. To the left, a black Christmas tree decorated with white skulls and silver tinsel adds to the dark, theatrical atmosphere.

view more: next ›