WolfLink

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

This post is why we can’t have nice things

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We aren’t individual helldivers, we are the destroyers, or whatever the top of the management on them is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

What about cell service providers selectively throttling your speed based on an estimate of the video resolution you are streaming? What about cell service providers counting tethering separately from normal data?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

you mean combos with The Akroan War and The Princess Takes Flight

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that’s how you want to put it, sure.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

And they aren’t going to come close to winning so if you really don’t like facism it’s probably best to vote for the only non-fascist candidate who has a chance of winning.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago
  • legal immigration ban (thankfully got overturned)
  • overturning Roe v Wade, leading to several abortion bans, leading to a serious decline in healthcare for pregnant women in general in affected states
  • attempted coup, and stated plans to try again

It’s not “scare tactics” when it actually happens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There have been a few cases where developers “port” their games to Mac by wrapping them in Wine.

Apple used Wine in their Game Porting Toolkit: https://www.applegamingwiki.com/wiki/Game_Porting_Toolkit

It will require some finagling, but it’s about as good as you will get for running windows only games on Mac.

Also games built for Intel Macs should be able to be run thanks to Rosetta.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Face it: there are only two candidates who realistically have a chance at winning the general election. It’s been that way for every US election we’ve seen.

If you vote for someone who doesn’t have a realistic chance of winning, that’s about the same as just not voting at all.

So you really have 3 choices: candidate A, candidate B, or indifference.

And there are two possible outcomes: candidate A or candidate B.

If one of those outcomes is at all preferable to the other, (e.g. either A is “better” or B is “worse”), it’s strategically best to vote for the main candidate you prefer, since that increases the chance of getting your preference of the two outcomes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Isn’t it a bit different when one candidate/party has outright said they plan to take steps to end democracy, and has previously participated in an attempted coup?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

My grandpa refuses to get a cell phone. Not even one that makes only calls. He regularly drives across the country, relying on libraries to print out maps and send emails to stay in contact with family.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I wanna press the button

view more: ‹ prev next ›